Paul Goble
Staunton,
August 13 – Moscow has worked hard to deny the obvious: the people of Siberia
are a distinct ethnos which has a history far longer than do the ethnic Russians
themselves and which arose and continues to develop as a result of “a melting
pot” of people. But now a prominent Russian Internet side has admitted both of
those things and more.
The
Russian-7 portal which often covers lesser known aspects of Russian history and
culture features an article entitled “’A Multi-National Melting Pot’: How the
Siberians Appeared,” in which it says among other things that “the term ‘Siberia’
is much more ancient than for example Rus (russian7.ru/post/mnogonacionalnyy-kotel-kak-poyavi/).
The term first appeared in the fifth
century common era and “until the 13th century, the word ‘Siberia’
was used exclusively to refer to a people and only later did it begin to be
applied to the region where they lived. ‘Siberia’
as the name of a land was first mentioned in medieval Iranian chronicles; and
in 1375, a Catalonian atlas mentioned ‘Sebur.’”
Ethnic Russians and Cossacks did not
make an appearance in the region until the end of the 15th century,
the portal continues. Their expansion
was sometimes peaceful but often involved violent clashes with the local
population. Beginning in the 17th century, the Russian state sent prisoners
to the region.
Many other people fled from European
Russia to Siberia, settled and intermarried with the local population and did
not return. Such marriages with the Khanty,
Mansi, Sakha, Buryats and others led to the formation of “a Russian-Siberian
gene pool. But it is important to remember that ethnic Russians were “only part
of the ancestry of the Siberian people.”
The portal cites the conclusions of
Novosibirsk sociologist Olga Yevchevskaya that the isolation of the Siberians is
an important part of their regional self-consciousness; and historian Yury
Chernyshov says that Siberians are deeply attached to their distinctive
identity which emerged because of the harsh climate and the continuing impact
of a melting pot.
All this may seem of only marginal
interest, but it is extraordinarily unusual for anyone in Moscow to acknowledge
Siberian identity as an ethnic one distinct from Russian or to point out that
Siberia referred to a people for centuries before it was applied to a region
and is a far more ancient term than Rus in which Russians place so much value.
And it is also remarkable although
less rare for anyone in Moscow to acknowledge that a melting pot has worked
anywhere in Russia, not only because that term comes from the United States but
also because it implies not the assimilation of smaller groups by a larger one
(e.g., the Russians) but a fusion of various nations into a new and different
one.
With this article, Russia-7 will likely
spark a new debate between Russian nationalists, who deny the Siberians
standing as an ethnic nation and have refused to count them as such in recent
censuses, and the Siberians themselves, who will see this a step forward in
their effort to win acknowledgement of what they are -- a separate nation with
a separate territory.
No comments:
Post a Comment