Paul Goble
Staunton,
November 5 – Since the time of the Mongol conquest, when the Horde gave to
Moscow the task of doing “the dirty work” of the occupation by the Mongols of
Russian lands, the rulers in that city have continued to treat the rest of the
territory and population as any other occupying force would, according to
Aleksey Shiropayev.
If
that origin as reified by Ivan the Terrible, the true “founding father of
Russia” is not recognized and if the way in which the Bolsheviks only
intensified that pattern of colonial rule, the Russian regionalist says, there
is no hope for understanding the situation of Russia today or why such a regime
can rot but not reform (afterempire.info/2018/10/30/occupant/).
“Moscow
seized and occupied Rus,” Shiropayev argues, and that is “the starting point
for an understanding of the origin of the Russian state and the term ‘Russia.’”
Ivan the Terrible was a true follower of the policy of an occupier. Indeed, one
can say that that is “’the secret’ of that ruler.”
Ivan’s
era, the analyst continues, was “the era of the final and one can say
Bolshevik-style suppression of Rus by Russia.”
The ruler’s oprichniks were
simply a new variant of the khan’s baskaks
on the Russian land; and the tsar himself was typologically a khan.” As
such, the former were nothing so much as “a band of occupiers” headed by “an
occupier tsar.”
“This
became the genetic code of Russian statehood,” Shiropayev says, something so
deeply rooted that that it continues to give that arrangement is “occupation
and repressive character.”
The
Bolsheviks only reinforced this pattern, he continues. The international
composition of that party’s ranks initially perfectly corresponded to Ivan’s oprichniks which were also “international”
and not Russian in their composition.
Stalin’s parallels with Ivan are even more obvious, although their most profound
aspect is often overlooked.
And
that is the desire to shut Russia off from influence coming in from the
West. To that end, “Stalin and company
openly reproduced, true, in much greater size, the genocidal-repressive methods
of Ivan the Terrible and his grandson, Ivan III. There was a multitude of
examples” to emulate.
“What
more is there to say?” Shiropayev asks rhetorically. “We live in a state
established by Ivan the Terrible. The appearance of Vladimir Sorokin’s book, The Day of the Oprichnik, is extremely
noteworthy – the intuition of a real writer is always unerring.” And Ivan’s
system lives on in today’s special services and the interior ministry as anyone
can testify.
According
to the analyst, “the ‘organs’ in their attitude toward the people retranslate
the position of the state as a whole. And this occupier-state cannot be
changed. It can rot, it can fall apart, it can go insane, and it can even mimic
something else, but it cannot become otherwise, free and open.” Its genetic
code is just too deeply embedded for that.
No comments:
Post a Comment