Paul
Goble
Staunton, December 10 – When a
horrific earthquake hit Armenia in early December 1988 and claimed more than
25,000 lives, Moscow and the international community responded with a
remarkable outpouring of assistance; but all too quickly, most turned away as
this humanitarian disaster was eclipsed by the political developments of the
next three years.
Now, 31 years later, Gagik Saakyan,
the mayor of Spitak says, 20 percent of the survivors in his city which came to
symbolize earthquake the earthquake and its consequences, still live in
temporary housing with few prospects that their situation or even that of their
children will change anytime soon (forum-msk.org/material/news/16118843.html).
In reporting his remarks, Anatoly
Baranov of the pro-communist portal Forum-MSK, says that the amount of money
Yerevan has budgeted for next year to help the recovery of those still
suffering from the 1988 earthquake – 6.6 million US dollars – would not build a
single apartment building in Moscow. It certainly won’t bring housing to the
people of Spitak.
Many still refer to the Armenian
earthquake as the Spitak earthquake, not because it had the most victims –
Gyumri did – or because it was at the epicenter – that “honor” belongs to the
village of Nalband – but Spitak suffered more immediately obvious destruction
than Gyumri but nonetheless had survivors. In Nalband, everyone was killed.
The tragedy was so great that the world
responded. Mikhail Gorbachev sent enormous sums from the Soviet budget and even
asked the West for help, something no Soviet leader had done for almost half a
century. The world responded. For the
history of that response, see Pierre Verluise’s Armenia in Crisis: The 1988
Earthquake (Detroit, 1995).
Moscow and the international
community celebrated how much they did. But after only a few months, both
looked away, distracted by other calamities and by the political developments
in Armenia and its conflict with Azerbaijan that were shaking the USSR to its
foundations and ultimately sending it to the dustbin of history.
As a result, more than three decades
after the earthquake, one in every five residents of Spitak live in temporary
housing in a place where, as Baranov notes, the winters are very cold. And an
entire generation has grown up in what might best be described as a refugee
camp not far away from their homes but rather right next where their homes used
to stand.
No comments:
Post a Comment