Paul
Goble
Staunton, April 11 – The failure of
the Russian economic development ministry to present a promised report two days
ago on the prospects for the country’s economy is indefensible given that independent
agencies have prepared such reports and means Moscow will be headed into a
deepening crisis without knowing where Russia is, Vladislav Inozemtsev says.\
That is dangerous at any time, but
it is “exceptionally irresponsible” in times of crisis like the present because
it means that the authorities are not in a position to make good decisions
because without good information or at least the best available, good policies
are a random act (echo.msk.ru/blog/v_inozemcev/2623012-echo).
This week, when Moscow analysts were
focusing on the outcome of talks with OPEC about oil production, most missed an
equally important indicator of where Russia is now and where it may be heading.
The economic development ministry in a press release said it was delaying its
promised assessment because of “the current situation in the economy” (rbc.ru/economics/09/04/2020/5e8f5dca9a79475039f595ac).
But it is precisely at times of
turbulence that such reports are needed, the economist says; and it is also the
case that while the ministry was failing to prepare one, there have been five
predictions about the Russian economy for this year from the Center for Macro-Economic
Analysis, the World Bank, the Fitch Agency, Citi Bank, and McKinsey consulting.
Their assessments varied, “but, on
the one hand, all pointed to an inevitable decline … and on the other, the depth
of that decline grew with each passing day.” The initial report, by the World
Bank, suggested the Russian economy would fall by one percent; the McKinsey
report which followed several days later suggested that it would be at least 10
percent.
“Russia encountered the global
coronavirus pandemic a month to six weeks later than the majority of other
countries infected,” Inozemtsev says. “The decline in the price of oil which
occurred at the beginning of March almost did not touch the real flow of hard
currency into the country.” And the population was told to stay home “only on
March 30.”
“All this means,” the Russian
economist says, “that the official results of the first quarter, which in “first
approximation will be announced a week from now will be very encouraging and
that they will point to a continuation of growth.” And that will lead some in
the regime and its propagandists to talk about Russia as “an island of
stability” in a storm-tossed world.
But such self-satisfaction “in the
absence of an officially recognized assessment of prospects is dangerous in any
economy and in a bureaucratized one like [Russia’s] especially so,” Inozemtsev
says.
The prospects in fact are not good. “In
the best case,” the new oil deal will keep prices at about 30 US dollars a
barrel.” Russian exports will fall by a quarter, and Moscow will receive 130
billion US dollars less from its export of oil this year than last, “nine
percent of the GDP of last year.
Adding to that, “economic activity
will be practically paralyzed from the end of March to the middle of May,”
resulting in a 40 percent falloff in GDP for those two months, which will mean “no
less than five percent” decline for the year as a whole. And unlike Western governments,
the Russian regime isn’t prepared to prop up the economy with massive
injections.
And “finally,” Inozemtsev says, “the
basis of any economy, the incomes of its citizens, cannot fail to contract this
year, most probably by “no less than 10 percent.” That figure, he continues, is “not ‘pessimistic’
but an objective assessment of the decline which we will suffer in this year.”
To avoid that requires that the
government be given the information that is available to others and develop
policies specifically designed to counter these trends. “If the Ministry for
Economic Development has lost the competence or interest to fulfill its functions,
it must be replaced” by some analytic center that will do so.
Otherwise, the Russian government
will be flying blind into a storm far greater than it imagines.
No comments:
Post a Comment