Paul
Goble
Staunton, June 1 – Only one Russian
employed by the government or in government firms has proposed innovations,
with the share lowest among siloviki –
only 0.4 percent of them say they have – even though the pandemic shows that
officials must be ready to innovate if the country is to overcome challenges,
according to a Higher School of Economics study.
Sociologists Alena Nefedova and
Marina Chernysheva presented their research, based on earlier country-wide surveys,
to the April International Scholarly Conference at the HSE. It has now been
summarized at iq.hse.ru/news/369953056.html).
Their conclusions underscore why it is so difficult for Russian institutions to
change course.
A key factor for the successful operation
of any organization is the offering, consideration and implementation of
innovative ideas, the two say. Without such ideas, businesses will lose out to
competitors, and government agencies will prove ineffective, especially when
under stress from a crisis.
In many countries, employees are the
most important source of innovation because they can suggest how to do things
better or even suggest how existing capacity can be turned to produce new
things altogether. Some managers and officials, recognizing this, encourage
proposals for innovation, but others do not.
Nefedova and Chernysheva analyzed
4100 responses of Russians aged 18 to 65 working in government bureaucracies or
state-owned enterprises concerning their willingness to offer innovations. “It turned out,” they say, “that only 6.3 percent
of employees of Russian companies had ever proposed innovations to their
bosses.”
The share of those who had done so
varied. Those working in agriculture and the siloviki were the least likely to
have proposed innovations, 1.1. percent and 0.4 percent respectively, while
those in science and culture were more likely, about six percent in these two
sectors, the sociologists say.
What is especially worrisome at the present
time is that health care workers are among the least likely to propose changes,
something that can prevent new ideas from being implemented or ensure that old
ideas that do not reflect new realities continue to dominate the situation.
A classic example of such disasters occurred
when siloviki checked by hand the passes of Russians entering the Moscow metro,
thus ensuring that the coronavirus would spread from one person to another in
the long lines that backed up. There are other and better ways to check passes,
but they weren’t proposed or at least not implemented, the two scholars say.
Unfortunately, Nefedova and
Chernysheva report, Russian bureaucracies and state-owned corporations do little
to encourage their employees to offer new ideas. Only one in five firms has an official
responsible for innovation, and only one in six rewards those who make
proposals financially.
No comments:
Post a Comment