Paul
Goble
Staunton, December 9 – For most of
the quarter century since Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania recovered their de facto independence, when Russian or
Western analysts spoke about demographic problems in them, they focused almost
entirely on the role of ethnic Russians and Russian speakers in their
populations.
But now, as that issue has faded –
the ethnic Russian share of the populations has fallen as a result of
differential birth and death rates and departures, and the role of non-citizens
has declined as ever more “Russians” choose to become citizens of these
countries – analysts both in Russia and the West are focusing on the real
demographic challenges to these countries.
There are three main kinds: rapidly
aging populations as a result of low and declining birth rates and longer live
expectancies, the exodus of young and well-educated cohorts to other parts of
Europe, and the declining size of the workforce capable of paying the taxes to
support the elderly.
Such problems are not unique to
Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania; but they are especially marked in these three
countries. And Russian commentators are now focusing on these issues even more
than on ethnic ones in their efforts to find ways to attack the Baltic
countries or to gain leverage on their activities.
One Russian commentator, Aleksandr
Nosovich, who is notorious for his anti-Baltic views, takes up this issue to
argue that Baltic countries face “a systemic crisis, not the quiet aging” that
many there already expect (rubaltic.ru/article/politika-i-obshchestvo/08122017-depopulyatsiya-pribaltiku-zhdet-sistemnyy-krizis-vmesto-tikhoy-starosti/).
All three are losing population,
Lithuania and Latvia more than Estonia, because many of their working-age
citizens are emigrating for jobs abroad. They can thus see a time when their
total population will be much smaller than it is today (rus.err.ee/643849/jeksperty-bjut-v-nabat-zhitelej-jestonii-s-kazhdym-godom-stanovitsja-vse-menshe).
Much
of this decline, Nosovich says, is among people who should be paying the taxes
that will be needed to cope with the rising share of the populations in the
three over the age of 65. Without their presence and their taxes, the Baltic governments
will be forced to cut pensions and thus anger many older people who had been
among their biggest boosters.
Maranda
Bechman, chief statistician of Latvia’s Central Statistical Administration,
says she doesn’t want to call this “a catastrophe, but the situation resulting
from the loss of [this portion of] the population is very serious.” And Priit
Riistok of Estonia’s finance ministry says exactly the same thing.
But
it is not just that there won’t be enough workers to provide support for the
increasing number of pensioners, the Russian commentator says. There won’t be
enough to operate the economies at the current level (ru.delfi.lt/news/live/predstavili-novye-dannye-litve-grozit-demograficheskij-krizis.d?id=76503467).
To cope with that, these countries
need to attract more immigrants, but they do not see where such people are
likely to come from or how they could be integrated. And consequently, barring breakthroughs in
productivity, the economies of the three are likely to stagnate or even
decline, forcing them to try to get more help from the EU at a time the EU is cutting
back.
Many in the Baltic countries believe that they can be “’the hospice of
Europe,’ in which elderly residents of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania will
peacefully live out their time,” Nosovich says. “But instead of a quiet old age
and a slow decline, these countries are going to face a systemic crisis and
social catastrophe.”
He
says that the social and political stability in the three now resembles that in
the Soviet Union under Brezhnev. “Then the Soviet authorities” received praise
for their breakthroughs. But that didn’t last because the regime proved
incapable of translating these into forces that would help the entire
population.
Something
similar is happening in Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania now, Nosovich says. “The
long-term demographic trends are just as fatal as the economic ones were for
the Soviet Union.” Up to now, few in Tallinn, Riga and Vilnius appear all that
disturbed; but that will change as conditions begin to deteriorate.
Nosovich
almost certainly overstates the problem especially given the history of Baltic
inventiveness, but his remarks are important for two reasons. On the one hand,
he is pointing to a real problem not linked to ethnicity, an implicit
confession that from Moscow’s point of view that factor isn’t as important as
it once was.
And on the other, his attention to this issue suggests
that many in Moscow may be factoring it rather than just ethnicity in their
plans to continue to seek to destabilize the Baltic countries. If that is the
case, then the Balts and their friends need to take these trends seriously
indeed.
No comments:
Post a Comment