Paul
Goble
Staunton, April 21 – Adolf Hitler
was convinced that he would get away with the Holocaust of European Jewry
because “nobody talks about the Armenians anymore,” a reference by the Nazi
leader to the world’s failure to focus on the mass murder of the Armenian
people in the Ottoman Empire in 1915.
Hitler was wrong on both counts: he and
his regime were held accountable for his acts of genocide by an international
community which has committed itself to the proposition that no such crime must
ever be allowed to happen, and ever more governments around the world are
officially recognizing the events of 1915 as a crime against humanity.
But the Nazi believer’s calculation has
been replicated by other leaders who assume that the enormous flow of events
will mean that few will keep track of what they have done and thus allow them
to escape responsibility, as Hitler thought he could, for their actions either
by lying about what happened or quite often by eclipsing one crime with others.
All too few people today, for
example, talk about Vladimir Putin’s crimes against the Chechen people or against
the Georgians, preferring to focus instead on his more immediate crimes in
Ukraine, in the elections of Western democracies, and in the poisoning of
Skripal. As a result, each new crime becomes a kind of “cover up” for the
earlier ones.
Given the limited attention span of
most individuals and nearly all governments, this use of one crime to obscure
others is often successful; and all too often after an initial expression of
horror about an action, many stop their criticism, turn away, and focus instead
on more recent outrages.
Media-savvy politicians like Putin –
and he is far from alone in this -- count on this all too human limitation; and
all too often, they are rewarded when those who were initially concerned about
some action turn toward other crimes as they are presented. That is something that all those who care
about human rights, democracy and freedom need to fight against.
This week marks a case in point. One
year ago, on April 29, 2017, the Russian Supreme Court banned the activities of
the Jehovah’s Witnesses. Happily, the international community reacted with
outrage to this action which, Moscow’s protestations notwithstanding, was about
keeping the followers of that faith from professing it.
Over the last 12 months, the Russian
authorities have violated the rights of that denomination more than 250 times;
and this week, in a horrific “commemoration” of the court’s decision, they
stepped up their persecution of Jehovah’s Witnesses across the Russian
Federation (sova-center.ru/misuse/news/persecution/2018/04/d39249/
and golos-ameriki.ru/a/jehovah-witneses-persecution-in-russia/4355976.html).
The Jehovah’s Witnesses organization
in the United States has issued a statement declaring that “these most recent
raids represent a serious escalation of state-sponsored human rights abuse, one
reminiscent of Soviet-era repression and Nazi persecution experienced by
minority groups in the early days of these former regimes.”
“Without international awareness,”
the Witnesses’ office in New York says, “we anticipate that this situation will
increase in both severity and frequency in the days ahead.” Tragically, the
international community now appears far less focused on this issue, and the
Kremlin may assume that it can get away with its vicious campaign.
A half century ago, the great
Russian memoirist Nadezhda Mandelshtam wrote that “happy is that country where
the despicable is at least despised.” Sometimes speaking out against the abuse
of human rights is all that anyone can do; failing to speak out is never a good
option: it gives those behind such actions the conviction that they can get
away with their crimes.
No comments:
Post a Comment