Paul
Goble
Staunton, April 21 – In the March 18
elections, Vladimir Putin “received a mandate to change nothing … not in the struggle
with corruption, not in health care, and not in education,” Grigory Yavinsky
says. Therefore, everyone lost the elections: those who voted for Putin,” those
who voted for his opponents left and right, and those who didn’t vote at all.
Speaking to a forum on the prospects
of Yabloko, the party he founded, the longtime opposition politician says the
only ones who won out were those who exist as “parasites” on the system and use
it to enrich themselves. The rich got
richer, the poor poorer, and the Putin regime only exacerbated those two trends
(echo.msk.ru/blog/yavlinsky_g/2188454-echo/).
And both the campaign and its
outcome showed what the elections should have been about, he continues:
changing the Putin system and improving fire safety so that Russians don’t die
at a rate 12 times that of people in Western Europe and can go to the malls
without fear for their lives.
Moreover, Yavlinsky continues, they
should have been about establishing the inviolability of private property, the separation
of power and business, and creating a system in which business will have an
interest in taking care of their customers rather than simply following the
dictates of their political bosses in order to get rich.
No comments:
Post a Comment