Paul
Goble
Staunton, December 28 – Efforts by
Moscow to reduce the number of non-Russians by allowing people to declare more
than one nationality in the upcoming 2020 census and to deny groups within the
Russian nation the right to declare a separate nationality and thus cut into
the size of the Russian shar of the population have attracted the most
attention.
But they aren’t the only conflicts that
have surfaced in the run-up to this enumeration. One of the most serious is
between Tatarstan and Bashkortostan in which the latter is spending money to
encourage Tatars to re-identify as Bashkirs and to support the Kryashens and
Astrakhan Tatars as separate peoples.
According to Ilnar Garifullin of the
Idel-Real portal, Bashkir activism in this area has become so widespread
and well-financed that some Tatars alarmed by their own government’s failure to
counter it are speaking of the existence
of “ethno-missionaries” and “ethno-marauders” (idelreal.org/a/30347867.html).
Bashkir officials are not only
working hard to boost the share of people in Bashkortostan who declare
themselves to be Bashkirs rather than Tatars but also promoting the idea that “almost
half” of Tatarstan is “historically” part of Bashkortostan and should be
populated by Bashkirs, a prelude to a demand for border change (bash.news/bst/istoricheskaya-sreda/).
Ufa is spending money on this
project and publications it supports have large print runs. In one case,
Garifullin says, books promoting ethnic reidentification came out in 90,000 copies.
Kazan, in contrast, has put out one book, with a tirage of only 500, the result
of the absence of government funding.
Tatarstan officials have promised
change but nothing has happened, the commentator says; and they seem oblivious
to the fact that not only will the kind of falsifications that occurred in 2002
and 2010 be repeated this time but that media efforts will play a bigger role
than ever before in convincing people it is better to identify this way than
that.
Garifullin concludes his Jeremiad
against Kazan by quoting Lenin who famously observed that “yesterday was too
early, but tomorrow will be too late.”
No comments:
Post a Comment