Saturday, July 4, 2020

Russian Court Extends Detention of Ingush Political Prisoner Sautiyeva Another Month


Paul Goble

            Staunton, July 3 – Zarifa Sautiyeva, whom Memorial has labelled a political prisoner, will spend the first anniversary of her arrest last year for involvement in the March 2019 protests as a result of a decision by the Stavropol Kray court to extend her time behind bars to at least August 2 (fortanga.org/2020/07/sud-prodlil-arest-zarife-sautievoj-eshhyo-na-mesyats/).

            The decision, her lawyers say, is not only completely illegal but also internally inconsistent as the kray court overruled a lower court’s findings concerning the charges against her but said she must remain in detention rather than await trial at home under supervision.  Like other Ingush prisoners, Sautiyeva has seen her detention extended again and again.

            That process alone, her attorney says, is a violation of her rights and puts her at greater risk of being infected by the coronavirus given that she has to be moved about for hearings where these decisions are announced. It also inflicts unreasonable mental suffering by raising and then dashing hopes of release. 

            Meanwhile, a court in the Ingush capital of Magas held another hearing in the case of Rashid Maysigov, a former Fortanga writer whom the powers that be have charged with possession of narcotics and of broadsides calling for the independence of Ingushetia (fortanga.org/2020/07/eks-redaktor-fortangi-ne-priznal-vinu-v-upotreblenii-narkotikov/).

            Maysigov denies all charges, even though he initially confessed under pressure, says they were brough exclusively as a result of his journalistic work covering the Ingush protests and argues that siloviki planted both the drugs and the broadsides in his apartment in the course of a search they conducted there. 

            The journalist’s lawyers sought to have the items seized during the investigation excluded from the case, but the judge denied their request. However, he did agree to call for an investigation of the documents that have been presented regarding those documents before ruling further.

No comments:

Post a Comment