Paul
Goble
Staunton, May 20 – Earlier this
week, Vladimir Putin had a meeting with the leaders of some of Russia’s most
prominent editors of the opposition media, a session that has sparked
controversy because the participants were required to agree not to discuss that
had transpired behind closed doors.
Dmitry Muratov, the chief editor of Novaya gazeta and one of those who took
part, reported on this arrangement in an interview on Dozhd television on Wednesday. And his acknowledgement sparked a
firestorm (nr2.lt/News/politics_and_society/O-sekretnoy-vstreche-Putina-s-glavnymi-redaktorami-tak-nazyvaemyh-oppozicionnyh-SMI-125461.html).
Civitas editor Rimma Polyak
denounced the willingness of opposition journalists to take part in such a
meeting where they were required to give a non-disclosure agreement. “Would
editors in chief in a democratic country attend a closed meeting with a
president?” she asked and suggested Putin was pursuing a kind of “hybrid”
campaign against opposition outlets.
“It is difficult to imagine a closed
meeting of the US president with the editors of The Washington Post, The New
York Times, the Chicago Tribune, and so on.” But clearly, she argued,
opposition editors in Russia assume that everything is “relative” and that they
thus should be willing to do this under Putin. After all, they’ve had 17 years’
experience.
Other journalists,
including Dmitry Chorny, an editor of Forum-MSK and a member of the Union of
Journalists of Moscow, were if anything even more critical, suggesting that
what Putin has done is to blur the line between official and opposition
journalism and weaken the latter in the eyes of the population (forum-msk.org/material/news/13220742.html).
No comments:
Post a Comment