Paul
Goble
Staunton, May 27 – The Ukrainian government
continues to call its fight against the Russian invasion of the country “an
anti-terrorist operation,” instead of declaring it to be a real war. According to Mykola Sungurovsky, this failure
reflects the fact that Kyiv elites still “think in the categories of economic profit
and electoral advantage.”
Calling Russian actions a war, the
Ukrainian military analyst says, is a matter of principle for “both the domestic
and foreign understanding of this conflict,” and failure to use the right term
gives Vladimir Putin and his much-hyped notion of “hybrid” war an undeserved advantage
(glavred.info/politika/principialnyy-vopros-pochemu-voynu-na-donbasse-do-sih-por-nazyvayut-ato-437963.html).
That is because,
Sungurovsky continues, the words officials use determine “not only attitudes”
toward what is going on “but also the behavior of both those who are directly
participating in it and also third parties.”
Indeed, “it is wrong to speak about the absence of war and yet demand
from society mobilization.”
“From the
very beginning of this conflict,” he says, “the Ukrainian authorities have
violated national law” which requires “the introduction of martial law” if
Ukraine is invaded. But so far, the government has been unwilling or unable to
take that legally required step, one entirely justified by what Russia has
done.
Repeated
statements by senior officials that Ukraine would move in that direction “in
the case of the intensification of the conflict” have not been followed by
action. And “in many cases,” Sungurovsky
says, “the role of the state was compensated by the role of civil society and
its volunteer movements.”
But
Ukrainian society cannot be mobilized unless the government declares the
existence of a state of war. Indeed, without such a declaration, “the powers
that be do not have the right to demand from society either trust or respect or
even more that very much needed mobilization needed for victory over the enemy.”
The
Ukrainian government says it can’t take this step lest the IMF refuse to extend
it credits, but the Kyiv analyst points out that the IMF has not made such
demands – and would be unlikely to if Ukraine declared martial law in one or
another parts of the country or even for the country as a whole, given that
Putin’s “hybrid” invasion touches the entire country.
No comments:
Post a Comment