Paul Goble
Staunton,
August 9 – The government of Kyrgyzstan exercises less control over Islam and
other religions than any other country in Central Asia and the leaders of mosques,
which now outnumber schools, in most cases continue to follow the Soviet-era
approach of focusing on rituals rather than on social questions, Bishkek
experts say.
As
a result, many Kyrgyz, especially in the southern regions of the country, are listening
to radical missionaries who provide answers to their social and political
questions, a development that has put their country on the path toward Islamist
radicalization, Yekaterina Ivashchenko says (fergananews.com/articles/10111).
Kyrgyzstan is “the only country of
former Soviet Asia where religious questions are controlled quite weakly by the
government,” the Fergana analyst says; and as a result, religion, often in its
most radical forms, is filling the vacuum” caused by the lack of a national
idea and by the failure of the traditional religious leadership to provide more
than rituals.
In addition to the obvious growth of
religious dress and behavior in the streets, a clear sign of the problem,
Elvira Ilibezova of the El-PIkir public opinion firm says, is that the Kyrgyz
government does not have laws which allow it to move against religious radicals
and does not conduct studies of what is taking place among believers.
Many studies of religious life in
Kyrgyzstan have been undertaken, Ivashchenko says; “but these investigations
are undertaken only on the orders of foreign companies” and frequently the
results are not released either to the government or the public. As a result, Ililbezova continues, few are
aware of how far Kyrgyzstan has gone in the direction of Islamist radicalism.
The pollster suggests that the first
thing that the authorities need to do is to track money coming in from foreign
sources that is being used to build new mosques and to promote Islamic
values. Much of this money comes from
Turkey, Saudi Arabia, and the Gulf states. And then it needs to make sure that
Muslims do not engage in discrimination against others.
Unfortunately, at present, there is
only anecdotal evidence about foreign funding; and there are clear indications
that radical Muslim leaders often independent from mosques and medrassahs are
promoting hostility against followers of other faiths. That is a dangerous development that
threatens to undermine civil society in Kyrgystan, experts say.
Today, there are 2856 mosques and
107 medrassahs in Kyrgyzstan, figures that dwarf those for other faiths (401)
and the number of public schools (2262).
In 1991, there were fewer than 40 mosques there. Some of these mosques
and medrassahs are controlled by radicals, but most simply provide ritual
services and thus do not represent a bulwark against the Islamists.
Young people in particular want the
mosques to provide them with answers to key social and political questions, but
the mullahs in them seldom do so. As a result, ever more Kyrgyz are turning to
mullahs and imams not connected with the mosques and offering radical answers
at a time when the mosques are not offering any at all.
In recent months, Bishkek has closed
seven mosques because of radicalism; but that focus on the mosques alone is
doing little to stop the Islamization of the country. Now, ever more Kyrgyz are
demanding that the government block the distribution of religious literature by
Muslims just as it has sought to do in the case of the Jehovah’s Witnesses.
Civil society
activists and some government officials say that the government must focus on
providing better religious instruction for mullahs by establishing special
religious schools as Uzbekistan has so that the leaders of the mosques can
serve as the first line of defense against radicalization rather than being a
doorway through which people go on their way to radicalism.
Kadyr Malikov, the director of the Religion, Law
and Politics Analysis Center in Bishkek, says that the current situation
reflects the religious vacuum that Soviet power created. Kyrgyz want religion
to help fill it, but the poorly educated mullahs lack the skills needed – and
missionaries, often radical, are responding.
Increasing religiosity by itself is
neither bad nor a problem, he argues. Rather the problem is that the mosque
leadership isn’t performing its tasks adequately and the government has lost
the initiative less to them than to the missionaries who can give answers
neither the mullahs nor the officials can.
The government needs to work with
the Muslim leadership rather than simply attack it. If it does the latter, it
will push the ritualists into the arms of the radicals and then the government
will face an opponent that will almost certainly prove stronger than it
is.
No comments:
Post a Comment