Paul Goble
Staunton,
August 1 – Vladimir Putin is almost universally described as a brilliant
political tactician, but if the West is to counter him effectively, it must
recognize that he has a strategic vision of the world, one that constitutes “a
long game” he expects Russia to win even if it takes losses in the short term.
Vadim
Shtepa, the editor of the After Empire portal, argues that it is critically
important to understand Putin’s vision,
a vision he laid out in his interview with Vladimir Solovyev when he said “our
opponents sometimes achieve their goals at a tactical level, but I think in the
long run we will win” (rus.delfi.ee/projects/opinion/chto-takoe-putinskaya-igra-vdolguyu?id=83133643).
Putin’s
long game is “an attempt at a global response to the West for the defeat in the
former Cold War which led to the disintegration of the Soviet empire. But it is
directed not simply at the rebirth of the former USSR but is being conducted on
the territory of the West itself by the newest offensive means of ‘hybrid war.’”
Given his
KGB background, Shtepa continues, “Putin views world politics not as a system
of international agreements but only as a dividing up of ‘spheres of influence’
and ‘special operations’ of various degrees of force.” Thus he saw the
Ukrainian Maidan in 2014 not as a popular uprising against a corrupt regime but
as the work of shadowy special services.
And the
Kremlin leader responded with his Anschluss of Crimea and the unleashing of war
in the Donbass. All agreements Russia
had signed about respecting Ukraine’s borders “for him did not have the
slightest significance.”
Putin of
course recognizes that he is not in a position to defeat the West by a direct
attack, the regionalist says. And “therefore, his ‘long game’ is a series of a
multitude of ‘special ops,” ranging from direct military intervention as in
Ukraine, Georgia and Syria, to propaganda penetration as in Europe and the
United States.
More than
his Soviet predecessors and more than any current Western leader, Putin views
propaganda as a major tool to achieve his ends; and those require that it “play
on the contradictions within the present-day West,” rather than simply offering
an alternative Russian narrative, and thus spreading doubt in the West about
democratic values.
“Putin’s ‘long
game,’” Shtepa concludes, suggests that for the Kremlin leader, there is no
possibility that the political situation in Russia will change anytime soon.
But “history all the same teaches another lesson: when this or that ruler of an
empire begins to be confident in his own ‘eternal’ rule, this empire soon will
fall apart yet again.”
No comments:
Post a Comment