Paul
Goble
Staunton, June 14 – When Moscow
called for territorial delimitation of the federal subjects, it virtually
invited regional leaders to advance their own demands. The most extensive and
potentially explosive of these have been by Ramzan Kadyrov whose notions of a
Greater Chechnya are far larger than almost anyone imagines, Rais Suleymanov
says.
The Chechen leader, apparently with the
backing of Moscow, has already sparked protests in Ingushetia and Daghestan by
his demands, met and unmet, the notoriously anti-Muslim editor of Musulmansky
mir tells Anton Chablin of Svobodnaya presssa (svpressa.ru/politic/article/235470/).
Kadyrov’s
“appetites” are not limited to these two republics but extend already to predominantly
ethnic Russian Stavropol kray and “in the distant perspective, to the Pankisi
Gorge of Georgia” as well which is populated by Chechens, Suleymanov says. What Kadyrov is doing is typical of what other
ethnic leaders would like to do.
“The
main thing,” the Muslim affairs specialist says, “is to declare one or another
territory as one’s own ‘historical lands,’ and then wait to see how the
political situation developments. Therefore, one should not rush to the conclusion
that such scenarios of the development of events are impossible.”
According
to Suleymanov, people have an idea “about their own ethnic territory even if at
present there have lived and for a long time representatives of other ethnic
groups. More than that, for them, any place where representatives of a specific
ethnos live or have lived in a compact group can be part of this ethnic
territory.”
In
most places within the borders of the Russian Federation, non-Russian elites think
in these terms but do not act on them; but in Grozny, “the project of ‘a
Greater Chechnya’ has found support among the elite,” whose members are convinced
that they enjoy the support of the Kremlin as well.
Suleymanov
says that he has been surprised by “the passive reaction of the federal Center.”
It is as if either Moscow “doesn’t control the situation or alternatively
everything that is taking place has been agreed to and is developing according
to an approved scenario.” But one thing
is certain.
Any notions
about some kind of “’pan-Caucasus unity’” are nonsense. “We clearly see that people of different
nationalities view territory as ‘their own’ or ‘someone else’s.’” And that in
turn means that “regional identity is playing the most important role in the
self-identification of people” there.
Meanwhile, there
were two new developments in Ingushetia. First, five leaders of the Ingush
national protest movement announced that they would not cooperate with
investigators until conditions under which they are being held are
significantly improved (kavkaz-uzel.eu/articles/336642/).
And second,
Akhmed Pogorov, a leader of the protests who is still at large but on an
all-Russia most wanted list, said that Asa Yevloyev, a Yevkurov-controlled deputy,
was behind the slanderous Rossiya 24 broadcasts about the Ingush opposition (fortanga.org/2019/06/gotovit-syuzhet-na-rossiya-24-pomogala-deputat-aza-evloeva/).
No comments:
Post a Comment