Paul
Goble
Staunton, November 30 – A conference
in Nalchik last week on “Islamic Legal Culture in Present-Day Russia” urged
that those who favor the spread of the values of Islamic law should stop
talking about “shariat courts” because of the widespread view that those institutions
are intertwined with Islamist terrorism.
In its resolution, a blogger who
writes under the name “A Woman’s View from Nalchik,” the meeting, which
included scholars, Muslim leaders and officials from across Russia and even
abroad, made precisely that argument (kavkaz-uzel.eu/blogs/83787/posts/40704).
“The incorrect use of the term ‘shariat
court’ has given rise in public opinion to an association with terrorist lynch
law of international band formations … [Thus] all spiritual administrations are
recommended to refrain from this term as applied to the realities of the
secular Russian state,” the blogger quotes.
But “’you can’t
take the words out of a song,” the Woman’s View from Nalchik writer quotes with
approval. “Islamic legal culture is nothing
other than shariat, and kadys are shariat judges. In London, for example, shariat courts function
as such.” And she refers to presentations at the conference which show that is the
case in Russia as well.
Having made these observations, some
might expect that the blogger is opposed to shariat courts in Russia and hopes
to stop them from spreading. In fact, the reverse is true. She appears upset
about the subterfuge that the conference proposes because she believes that
shariat courts can play a valuable role in Muslim life.
She says that in her republic,
Kabardino-Balkaria, where the divorce rate is now 50 percent of all marriages,
shariat courts which operate on the principle of agreement rather than orders
and which can render their decisions far more quickly than civil courts, can
help save marriages by intervening early rather than late in the process.
That
is something that the Women’s View from Nalchik blogger says she and others can
only welcome. There is no need to hide this valuable contribution.
No comments:
Post a Comment