Paul
Goble
Staunton, May 11 – It is now a commonplace
that national leaders confronted by the challenges of the coronavirus pandemic
must balance between taking measures that protect the health of the population
and those which will save the economy from collapse, recognizing that any more
too far with regard to one may have adverse effects on the other.
But Vladimir Putin, Russian
sociologist Igor Eidman says, is choosing, in typical Russian fashion “a third
way which is leading to maximum losses economically and politically” (gordonua.com/blogs/eydman/vse-strany-spasayut-ili-lyudey-ili-ekonomiku-no-putin-poshel-po-tretemu-puti-vedushchemu-k-maksimalnym-i-ekonomicheskim-i-chelovecheskim-poteryam-1499315.html).
First, the Kremlin leader took steps
that “killed the economy, but he was not able by that to stop the epidemic.”
And then, Eidman continues, Putin imposed restrictions on the population only
to lift them at a time when the spread of the pandemic is increasing in the
Russian Federation at an even more rapid rate.
The impact on the health of the people
and the health of the economy will thus become increasingly deleterious and
mutually reinforcing with the health problems Putin is unleashing making the
economy worse and the economic decline he is overseeing ensuring that the
health of the population will decline.
Although Eidman does not say so in
this post, he has indicated in others that the source of the problem is that
Putin isn’t concerned about either but only about his own political survival
and is approaching that problem increasingly in a tactical rather than
strategic manner, something that may guarantee he will ultimately fail in that
sphere as well.
No comments:
Post a Comment