Paul
Goble
Staunton, June 13 – Ten days ago,
the Baikonur space center in Kazakhstan was supposed to mark its 65th
anniversary, but that event has been postponed as a result of the pandemic to
October 4 which will be the 63rd anniversary of the launch by the
Soviet Union of sputnik.
But an online conference did take
place, with Russian and Kazakh experts on space exploration talking about the
past and present of what was once the USSR’s only launching facility and now
has a less certain future (ritmeurasia.org/news--2020-06-13--bajkonur-perezagruzka.-inercija-postsovetskih-processov-i-sovmestnye-plany-kazahstana-i-rossii-49461).
Sergey Kozlov, a Kazakhstan legal
specialist, said the current situation of Baikonur is unique among
international space centers in that a site run by one country, in this case,
Russia, is located on the territory of another, Kazakhstan, an arrangement that
promotes cooperation but also raises questions in both countries.
Russia has a contract to rent the
facility until 2050 for 115 million US dollars a year. That money goes into Kazakhstan’s
general fund; in addition, it maintains the facility and subsidizes it at the
same rate as Moscow does for a city of federal importance. This represents a
significant Russian contribution to Kazakhstan.
For Russia, however, which has
additional space centers at Plesetsk and Vostochny, Baikonur is more about
geopolitics than about space exploration, giving Russia influence over
Kazakhstan but also providing a Russian facility outside of Russia with which
to develop ties with the space programs of third countries.
Many Kazakhs see the continuing
operation of Baikonur as very much to their own advantage. They now have five
satellites of their own in orbit, and they are cooperating not just with Russia
but also with a number of other countries to launch satellites for other
countries as well.
But according to Almaty geographer Marat
Shibutov, an active supporter of Baikonur, there are increasing signs of “Ludditism
and technophobia” among some Kazakhs who view the facility as a survival of the
imperial past rather than something which offers them advantages for the future. Some would even like to see it closed.
As a result, Adil Kaukenov, the head
of Kazakhstan’s China Center, says, “a negative image about breakthrough space
technologies which have the potential for work long years into the future is
being created. This problem,” he says, “is connected to the fact that at
present Kazakhstan residents feel little attachment to Baikonur.”
Russia very much wants to keep
Baikonur especially given the problems at Vostochny, but whether Kazakhstan
will be equally enthusiastic is now in question, making what was once the pride
of the Soviet space program into a litmus test of Moscow’s relations with the
former union republics.
No comments:
Post a Comment