Paul
Goble
Staunton, August 2 – Anatoly Nesmiyan
who blogs under the screen name El Murid says that Russia is rapidly heading
toward “Breakup 2.0” and that many of the events that preceded the first
edition of that in 199, both those that promoted that outcome and those that
opposed it, could very well be repeated in the next few months.
That is because, he argues, “the
cause of both ‘the first’ and ‘the second’ wave is one and the same thing, the
complete lack of correspondence between the administrative arrangements of the
system and the object it is administering.” As a result, the ruling
nomenklatura couldn’t and can’t take decisions to save the situation (el-murid.livejournal.com/4514558.html).
But there are some important
differences as well, Nesmiyan says. “The Soviet Union fell apart much more
rapidly than did the ruling party-soviet nomenklatura, and present-day Russia
is degrading significantly more slowly than the Putin camarilla has been and
continues to.” But the result will be the same as in 1991.
According to the blogger, there are
only two ways out: either those in power must give place to another elite
capable of developing the country or they must “bring the object being
administered” – Russia – into line with the capabilities of the existing elite,
accelerating the country’s degradation until it falls to a level at which its
state corresponds to that of the rulers.
In the unlikely event that Putin and
his entourage ceded power to others, Russia would have to organize an electoral
system excluding criminals from the old – that is, current – regime and
ensuring that the country would change rulers at all levels frequently so that
they could finally catch up with society.
But Putin isn’t going to give up
power voluntarily even if he is promised immunity; and as a result, Nesmiyan
says, the country is headed toward “Breakup 2.0.” As was the case 30 years ago,
the regional elites are going to be the key players. They’ve had a taste of
running things during the pandemic and as things get worse they will want more.
They aren’t behind the Khabarovsk
events but they undoubtedly welcome them because they are rapidly coming to
despite Putin and his regime as much as the Russian people do. They are watching and waiting for their time,
one where they can use such protests, to create their own independent power bases
– just as in 1991.
No comments:
Post a Comment