Paul
Goble
Staunton, December 19 – At his press
conference yesterday, Vladimir Putin said that Moscow is “developing a program
under which all formerly repressed peoples, including the Crimean Tatar people,”
will get “support in the economic and social spheres.” But as Israeli
commentator Avraam Shmulyevich notes, the Kremlin leader doesn’t really mean “all.”
In a post entitled “What is
Appropriate for a Crimean Tatar isn’t for a Circassian,” Shmulevich points out
that Moscow is highly selective in its approach to the many nations who were
subject to repression by the Russian Empire or by the Soviet state, supporting
some but rejecting calls to support others (avrom-caucasus.livejournal.com/372921.html).
According to the Israeli analyst,
Moscow officials following Putin’s lead are “prepared to pay the Crimean Tatars
and the Balkars and recognize the genocide of 1944.” For them, “that is not a
problem.” But “the genocide [of the Circassians] in 1864 was too long ago,” in
their view, and thus they need not “recognize it.”
Shmulyevich argues that this again
shows that “there is no hope that the Kremlin will listen to the tearful
requests of Circassian activists and that seeking a meeting is a hopeless
cause.” Moreover, it suggests that “Moscow is consciously continuing the Circassian
policy of Petersburg, ‘a policy of deportation and genocide.’”
That is almost certainly true, but
Putin’s words are likely to have another consequence as well. They are certain
to be read by all the other repressed peoples within the borders of the Russian
Federation as the basis for making new claims against Moscow, even if they have
little hope for achieving something in the near term.
And that beyond any doubt means that
Putin’s incautious language about the nationality question, just as was the
case with equally incautious words by his predecessors, will spark precisely the
kind of activism and assertiveness he does not want and lead to new conflicts
in the North Caucasus and elsewhere.
Because that is so, Putin’s response
to a question by Crimean Tatar journalist Safiye Ablyayeva yesterday merits
careful examination. (For the text, see kremlin.ru/news/47250.)
Ablyayeva, who works for the Crimean
Tatar television service in Simferopil, pointed out to Putin that “the local
authorities are not taking real steps to realize” his promises about the
rehabilitation of those peoples who were deported from Crimea in Soviet times.
And she asked: “why has this order remained without life up to now?”
Putin said that he does not think the
order “is without life and here is why: Because first no one can repeal it:
neither the local authorities nor anyone else.” This affects the Crimean
Tatars, the Germans, the Greeks, the Armenians, and the Bulgarians, all peoples
who were subjected to repressions.”
In his view, Putin continued, “this has
sufficiently serious political-moral meaning.” And he pointed to the official
status of Crimean Tatar on the occupied peninsula and work on resolving land
control issues. “If we constantly legalize seizures,” he said, “then we will
never establish order.”
According to the Russian president, the
state “owes a lot to these [repressed] peoples” and the Russian government is
working to provide it through money for infrastructure. At the same time, he
said, “it is necessary to close this page and after that to say that all are
equal.” Everyone must observe the law,
regardless of his or her nationality.
Putin ended by saying that this is a
task not just of today or tomorrow. It will take time, but he added “no one has
forgotten it.” Whether that is true just now in the Kremlin remains to be seen,
but it is certainly the case with the members of all those repressed in the past
– and Putin’s words will prompt some of them to act and demand equal treatment.
No comments:
Post a Comment