Paul
Goble
Staunton, December 23 – The old
saying that “there are no atheists in the foxholes” has a modern counterpart:
there are many who turn to the church when times are hard. That is what is happening in Russia now, with
ever more Russians attending church, wanting services to be in Old Church
Slavonic, and viewing the clergy not as alien but as part of the people.
Alina Bagrina, who heads the Sreda
polling and research organization, says that over the past year, Russians have
increasingly turned to the church for comfort and inspiration in what is a time
of troubles and what they want is the most traditional form of the faith (sreda.org/ru/2014/itogi-2014-alinyi-bagrinoy-rekord-prichashhayushhihsya-i-ozhidanie-krizisa/188867).
Polls taken this year show, when
compared to the results of surveys in 2011, that ten percent fewer Russians say
they do not believe in the basic doctrines of the church, seven percent fewer
want to hear services in Russian rather than Old Church Slavonic, and five
percent fewer say the clergy is cut off from the people.
All this suggests, she continues,
that as life as become more difficult, Russians are doing what they have always
done: turn to the church for help. She compares the current situation to what
Aleksandr Nevsky faced 800 years ago. At that time, in her telling, “the
Russian lands were being attacked from two sides: the Golden Horde was
attacking from the East and, led by Catholic bishops, the Swedes, the Germans
and the Lithuanians were attacking from the West.”
Then as again now, “it was
impossible to fight on both fronts,” Bagrina says. Consequently, Nevsky “decided”
we will fight in the West and make peace in the East. Then, after the passing
of several generations during which Russian people will pay tribute, they will
gather their forces for a worthy repulse of the enemy.”
“What is characteristic of the
current situation,” she argues, “is the absence of a frontline on the territory
of Russia.” Instead, she suggests, “we ourselves are creating this line” as
Russia makes its “inevitable” civilizational choice.
Bagrina’s views both about the links
between the current time of troubles and the turn to the church and between
today and Nevsky’s times are not a voice in the wilderness. They are being
echoed by many members of the Russian clergy and by Russian commentators as
well (ruskline.ru/news_rl/2014/12/22/rossiya_vocerkovlyaetsya_medlenno_no_neuklonno/).
No comments:
Post a Comment