Paul
Goble
Staunton, December 24 – Ethnic Russians
living in Latvia and Lithuania “view themselves as a community and respect
Russian culture but consider their native home to be the countries where they
live rather than Russia,” and this is true even of those born in Russia or who
are not citizens of their countries of residence, according to a new study.
The study, entitled “The Identity of
the Russian Ethnic Group and Its Expression in Lithuania and Latvia,” was
prepared by Arvidas Matiulionis of the Institute of Sociology of Lithuania and
Monika Frejute-Rakauskiene of Ethnic Research of Lithuania, has been published
in “Mir Rossii: Sotsiologiya, Etnologiya” of the Moscow Higher School of
Economics (mirros.hse.ru/2014-23-1/118335684.html;
summarized at opec.ru/1776568.html).
The two scholars compared the ethnic
self-definitions and identities of the Russian ethnic group in Lithuania and
Latvia. They defined ethnicity as “a community or identity based on common origin
and a feeling of solidarity,” as opposed to a people which they argue is “to a
greater extent connected with language, cultural and ideological”
considerations.
They conducted deep interviews with
ethnic Russians of various generations and waves in both countries and
supplemented that with polling data gathered by ENRI-VIS.
Ethnic Russians living in Latvia and
Lithuania, they point out, are “immigrants of various historical periods,”
ranging from those who fled religious persecution before 1917 to those who were
transferred there during the Soviet occupation.
According to the 1989 census, there were 906,600 Russians in Latvia (34
percent of the population) and 345,400 Russians in Lithuania (9.4 percent).
After the recovery of independence
in 1991, Russians in Lithuania could gain Lithuanian citizenship if they sought
it and had worked and lived there for two years before applying. According to the 2011 census, 99.3 percent of the
residents of the country have Lithuanian citizenship, including the overwhelming
majority of ethnic Russians.
The situation in
Latvia was more complicated because Riga insisted on its rights to deny
citizenship to anyone moved in by the occupation authorities. But over time and
under pressure from the EU, it has modified that stance and now has created
several paths by which the overwhelming majority of ethnic Russians there can
achieve Latvian citizenship.
According to the
2011 census, the two scholars report, 83.5 percent of the residents of Latvia
are Latvian citizens. That means that 14.2 percent are still non-citizens, the
vast majority of whom are ethnic Russians.
Polls show, Matiulionis
and Frejute-Rakauskiene say, that “the younger and middle generation of
Russians born in Lithuania identify themselves more with Lithuania than with
Russia. And even those Russian-speaking residents of Lithuania who were born on
another territory all the same consider Lithuania their native home.”
In Latvia, they
report, the differences between citizens and non-citizens is “more marked.” But
at the same time, “even those non-citizens who were born in Latvia identify
with it and not with Russia and especially with the place in which they live.”
Few in either country say they would leave even if guaranteed economic
security.
Equally
interesting, the scholars found that while some ethnic Russians reported ethnic
tensions based on language or culture in each country, none of them said that
they had been subject to discrimination because of their language or ethnicity.
And while polls
showed that ethnic Russians living in Lithuania “identify themselves with
Russia as their historical Motherland,” representatives of the younger
generation do so “not so much with the country as with Russian culture.” Ethnic
Russians born in Latvia “consider Latvia their motherland, although they
consider themselves Russians by ethnic origin.”
“Frequently,” the
two researchers say, “those respondents born in Latvia in general do not feel
ties with Russia and do not have friends or relatives there.” Moreover, members of the younger generation,
even those who identify as Russians, make a clear distinction “between Russians
living in Russia and Russians in Latvia and feel themselves linked not to
Russian Russians but to the community of Russians of Latvia.”
“Ethnic identity is
important for all generations of Russians in Lithuania and Latvia,” they
conclude, but that must be evaluated in terms of the fact that “in all
generations of Russians questioned in Latvia, local identity predominates: the
informants connect themselves with the street on which they live and with the
city as well.”
“Even
non-citizens, born in Latvia have [this] local identity,” they say. And thus while some may feel an attachment to
Russia on a cultural level, they consider Latvia – and also Lithuania – as their
motherland, even if they continue to “think in Russian” while speaking the
national languages well.
No comments:
Post a Comment