Paul
Goble
Staunton, March 5 – Two weeks ago,
Vladimir Putin named Aleksandr Levintal to head the Jewish Autonomous Oblast in
the Russian Far East, an action that Konstantin Kalachev says has reopened talk
about the future of a region rich in natural resources but which “in fact is
cut off from the rest of Russia” and has “long ago lost its specific national character.”
On Slon.ru, the Russian analyst
suggests that one can only understand what may happen next in Birobidzhan if
one examines how it came into existence and what any change might mean for
Moscow’s international reputation and control given the current economic crisis
and international tensions (slon.ru/posts/48976).
As early as
1921, the Soviet leadership began discussing where they might create a Jewish
region to promote agricultural settlement of Jews from other parts of the
country. Initially, most of those
involved in these discussions favored northern Crimea, the Azov steppes or the
Altay.
But by the end of the 1920s,
Kalachev notes, “the intra-party struggled had ended with the complete triumph
of Stalin, and his opponents, a large part of whom were Jews, lost influence.” As a result, Moscow ruled out Crimea which
was deemed important for other reasons, and Stalin began to consider setting up
something for the Jews in the Far East.
In 1928, the Soviet government
ordered that arrangements be made for Jewish “toilers” to be sent to the Far
East so that they could work “the free lands in the Pri-Amurye.” Few Jews were there already, and few were
attracted by this. In that year, there were only 34,000 people in what became
the Jewish Autonomous Oblast, and almost none was Jewish.
Over the next five years, 22,000
people moved into the area, but Jews did not form a majority of them. Nonetheless, in 1934, Moscow decreed the
establishment of the Jewish Autonomous Oblast directly subordinate to the
center, and four years later, the oblast was included within the newly-formed
Khabarovsk kray.
Administratively, that is how things
remained until 1991, Kalachev continues. At that time, the Presidium of the
RSFSR Supreme Soviet decided to separate the Jewish Autonomous Oblast from
Khabarovsk kray and make it an independent subject of the Russian Federation.
And so it continues to this day.
But despite its name and Moscow’s
decision to appoint Jews to head it, the Jewish Autonomous Oblast is not
Jewish. According to the 2010 census, only about one percent of the residents
of the oblast are Jews, and their numbers are in decline both as a result of
departures and assimilation. Chinese is “more useful” than Yiddish or Hebrew,”
Kalachev says.
In January, Yevgeny Primakov
described the Jewish Autonomous Oblast as “a political anachronism” because of
the fact that its “titular” nation formed such a small part of the population
and suggested it should be liquidated by amalgamating it with the larger and
more populous Khabarovsk kray.
But others objected. Aleksand Kynyev, a Russian analyst, said that
there was no need to do anything because “the JAO isn’t bothering anyone” and
because “the symbolism of liquidating the ‘Jewish’ autonomy would be received
negatively and would not improve the current image of the country.”
Others agreed, but the question of
whether it is “an anachronism” remains open.
“As ‘a Jewish reservation,’ it is an anachronism,” Kalachev says. But
changing its status would require a referendum and real effort by the local governor
and a new propaganda campaign to explain this to Jews elsewhere. Neither Moscow
nor he appear ready to do that.
As far as the role of the Jewish
Autonomous Oblast in promoting the image of Russia is concerned, he continues, all
anyone has to do now is to send someone with a camera to the region and he will
return with pictures of a depressed region to which almost no one wants to go
and everyone there wants to leave. That would do more harm than disbanding the
oblast.
But however that may be, Kalachev
argues, the autonomy is likely to continue to exist but for an entirely
different reason: China. More than 60
Chinese firms “with 100 percent Chinese capital” are there, Chinese farmers are
working about a quarter of the land, and more than a quarter of all living
space has been built with Chinese money.
The oblast’s leaders and Moscow as
well want to continue to develop those links, expanding them in the areas of
iron ore mining and linking the two places with new rail bridges. And both appear to have concluded that it
will be easier for a Moscow-appointed official to do that if he is responsible
only for the Jewish Autonomous Oblast.
But while that may make sense
administratively, Kalachev says, there is likely to be further “Chinese ‘colonization’”
of the Jewish Autonomous Oblast. Any economic expansion will require them, and “the
Chinese and not the Jews will define the economic future and ethnic face of
this oblast.”
Indeed, it concludes, in the not
terribly distant future, the Jewish Autonomous Oblast “could become most
Chinese part of the territory of Russia.”
No comments:
Post a Comment