Paul
Goble
Staunton, June 3 – Today, the
unpopular appointed governor of Karelia orchestrated a vote by the Petrozavodsk
city council against that city’s popular elected mayor, the latest development
in what is an ever-intensifying struggle between governors and mayors in
Russia’s regions and republics over just how “power verticals” at the regional
level are to function.
In 2013, Galina Shirshina, running
as an independent but drawing on support from Yabloko, won office as mayor of
the Karelian capital, and last year, she was rated “satisfactory” by the United
Russia-dominated city council. But her
links with opponents of Governor Aleksandr Khudilainen and their efforts to oust
him have changed the situation.
This morning, 23 of the 27 city
council members in attendance (there are 30 in all) voted to declare her work
“unsatisfactory.” If she is rated that way a second time, the deputies have the
right to hold an election to replace her, a vote they might hope to win and
thus oust an opponent (http://tass.ru/politika/2015457 and
vedomosti.ru/politics/news/2015/06/03/595012-mer-petrozavodska-galina-shirshina-poluchila-neud-za-rabotu-v-2014-g
).
After
the vote, Shirshina reassured her supporters that “nothing terrible had
happened” and that they could continue to work in the same way as before because
they are performing in an entirely satisfactory way – a clear challenge to
Khudilainen and even to his Moscow backers (stolica.onego.ru/news/270753.html).
Tensions between society and the
governor have long been a feature of politics in Karelia, largely because the
governor is viewed by the population as insensitive to the concerns of the
population of the republic. But what is
happening between Shirsina and the governor calls attention to tensions that
are much more common.
In “Novyye izvestiya” today,
commentator Sergey Yezhov suggests that what is going on is no less than “a war”
within “regional verticals” between governors who have nominal control over
entire territories and the mayors of major cities who in fact continue to
exercise real powers in portions of them (newizv.ru/politics/2015-06-03/220579-vojna-regionalnyh-vertikalej.html).
According to Yezhov, “the
authorities of Petrozavodsk are at risk of sharing the fate of the mayor of
Novgorod Veliky” whose leader was sent into retirement after he clashed with
the governor over performance. But as the Moscow commentator notes, almost any
mayor is at risk of facing charges that he has failed to fulfill his
responsibilities.
There is an inherent
tension between mayors and governors, a tension exacerbated by Moscow’s efforts
to “liquidate” the last remnants of local democracy. In recent months, Yezhov says, direct
elections of mayors have been banned in Blagoveshchensk, Yaroslavl, Sochi, Omsk
and in numerous cities of Novosibirsk oblast.
These bans have not gone
down well everywhere: In Krqasnoyarsk kray, deputies of the capital city
refused to amend the city code in the way the governor wanted. Another place
where such tensions are running high is Yekaterinburg, where independent Mayor
Yevgeny Royzman is under attack from United Russia officials.
While governors have more
resources and generally win, they often face a problem many of them apparently
did not expect: even when they name their loyalists to mayoral positions, those
people often break with them because they conclude that their cities and their
own political futures would be better if they did so, Yezhov says.
Such tensions are likely
to be exacerbated in the run up to the September elections of several
governors. Arkhangelsk is likely to challenge the regional governor there. Elsewhere there are likely to be problems as
well, all the more so because the struggle over resources is certain to
intensify.
In the past, Moscow could
keep such tensions under control, but now with its own resources running low,
the center doesn’t have the ability to do so everywhere. Consequently, Yezhov
suggests, the next step in elaborating a power vertical at the regional level
may become more politically controversial than was its earlier one.
No comments:
Post a Comment