Paul
Goble
Staunton, June 15 – Under UN rules,
neither the Russians nor the Ukrainians living in Crimea have the right to
conduct a referendum on self-determination in Crimea, former Russian prime minister
and now a Russian opposition leader Mikhail Kasyanov says. The only nation
which does, he says, is the Crimean Tatars.”
In an interview with Radio Liberty,
Kasyanov says that “I do not consider that Russians or Ukrainians living in
Crimea have the right to conduct a referendum in correspondence with the UN
charter on self-determination. Russians have already self-determined
themselves, they have their own state called the Russian Federation” (youtube.com/watch?v=4uUKTsVG7Rc
partially transcribed at turkist.org/2015/06/self-determination-crimean-tatars.html).
The Ukrainians
have already exercised their right of self-determination and have Ukraine, he
continues. But “the Crimean Tatars have not had the chance to engage in
self-determination. So that if in this case anyone has the right [to have a referendum
on self-determination], it is the Crimean Tatars.”
Any territorial disputes
among the countries of the region, Kasyanov says, should be resolved by
negotiations. But he argues that despite Vladimir Putin’s claims, “Russia had
no territorial claims against Ukraine, the basis [for the annexation of the
Ukrainian peninsula] was false and invented.”
“Supposedly, Russians in
Ukraine and in Crimea in particular were being discriminated against. [But]
there was nothing of the kind. Over the course of the entire 25 years of the
existence of Ukraine, there was not one registered case or complaint to any
organization Ukrainian, Russian or international about discrimination against Russians
and Russian speaking citizens,” Kasyanov says.
That
means, the Russian politician says, that the entire world now recognizes that
what Russia is doing in Ukraine is “an act of direct aggression and the illegal
annexation of territory” and that “all decisions taken by the Russian parliament
and president on Ukraine are illegal and do not correspond to international law
however interpreted.”
By
taking this position in support of the rights of the Crimean Tatars, Kasyanov would
appear to be putting himself somewhere between those Russians who oppose Putin
but support the Anschluss of Crimea and those who oppose both actions in the
name of Ukrainian sovereignty.
No comments:
Post a Comment