Paul
Goble
Staunton, June 6 – The economic
crisis is leading to the de-industrialization of parts of the North Caucasus
and that in turn is contributing to the flight of ethnic Russians from the region,
a departure that is fundamentally changing the ethnic balance in many republics
in that region.
That trend can be clearly seen in
Karachayevo-Cherkessia where the departure of Russians has reduced their share
of the population since the end of Soviet times from 42 percent to 31 percent,
while the shares of the two titular nationalities, the Turkic Karachays and the
Circassian Cherkess have gone up from 31 to 41 percent and from 10 to 12
percent respectively.
Russian activists, like Nikolay
Khokhlachev of that republic’s “Rus’” movement, acknowledge that “the outflow
of Russians is connected … above all with the deep social-economic crisis …
[which has meant that] major industrial enterprises have ceased to operate” (ng.ru/regions/2015-06-02/6_kchr.html).
In
the city of Cherkessk alone, the number of industrial workplaces has declined by
25,000, and many of the ethnic Russians who had occupied them have moved to
neighboring portions of the Russian Federation, including Stavropol, Krasnodar
and Rostov, in the hopes of finding work.
But
like many other Russian activists, Khokhlachev blames the actions of the now
dominant local ethnic community, the Karachays, and the tendency of its members
to give jobs and money to members of their own ethnic community rather than
anyone else, something that Russians not surprisingly find offensive and
another reason for leaving.
In
many government offices, there are simply no ethnic Russians left, he says, and
consequently, there is no one Russians can feel entirely comfortable appealing
to. The situation is especially serious in the courts where the titular
nationality has taken over many positions Russians used to occupy.
According
to Khokhlachev, the number of Russians remaining has declined to the point that
there have been few scandals about the replacement of Russians by others in
recent years. But that is evidence of the problem rather than evidence that no
such problem exists, he tells “Nezavisimaya gazeta.”
The
situation in government offices is paralleled, he continues, by the situation
in the economy. Private firms controlled by Karachays or Cherkess are given
contracts; those owned by Russians are not.
The consequences of that are that the Russian firms contract or close
far more often than do the others.
At
the same time, however, Khokhlachev admits that he cannot complain that the
republic government was not providing funds for remaining ethnic Russians. “In
that regard,” he says, “I will not complain. Our regions receive just as much
as the others.” But that doesn’t mean there aren’t hard feelings among Russians.
On
the one hand, he says, Russians resent the often grandiloquent statements of
Karachay teachers about the importance of that Turkic people and suggestions
that the Karachays live “from Africa to the Arctic.” And on the other, Russians are angry about
how the authorities commemorate anniversaries.
Republic
officials, he says, have refused to commemorate those from the republic lost in
World War II because most of those who died were ethnic Russians. Given the
deportation of the Karachays – Khokhlachev simply says they “didn’t live there”
at the time – the share of losses suffered by Russians is much larger than that
of others.
No comments:
Post a Comment