Paul
Goble
Staunton, April 21 – The Kremlin “doesn’t
see any reason not to trust” Chechen leader Ramzan Kadyrov’s assertion that
there has been no persecution of sexual minorities or other violations of human
rights in his republic, Putin’s spokesman Dmitry Peskov says, given the “anonymous” sources of alternative views (interfax-religion.ru/atheism/?act=news&div=66866).
“Unfortunately or happily up to now
there have not been any specific confirmations” of the charges made by the
media against Chechnya. Peskov added that the Kremlin “doesn’t know any other means
of defending oneself besides appeals to law-enforcement organs,” something the supposed
victims in Chechnya did not do.
He continued: “we know that when the
law is violated, a citizen goes and complains to the police and the media … But
there are no such people” in this case, and that suggests that these are “some
kind of phantom complaints” rather than genuine ones.
When Peskov was asked to comment on
the statements of media outlets that those who reported being victimized in
Chechnya were afraid to come forward, Peskov responded with the following
words: They how then can one defend them or check the situation? … Why are they
afraid. Are they afraid no one will defend them? This too is untrue.”
He pointed out that Russian
ombudsman Tatyana Moskalkova had already looked into the situation and been
unable to confirm any of the claims of abuse.
And he reported that Kadyrov had told Putin that Chechens were angry
about such “slander” and “will struggle with [it] within the law,” something the
Kremlin leader indicated he approved.
Peskov’s words undoubtedly reflect
Putin’s thinking, and they merit attention for three reasons. First, they are
yet another indication that the Kremlin isn’t willing or perhaps able to
challenge Kadyrov even when as in this case there is clear evidence that he is
violating Russian laws.
Second, Peskov’s remarks are yet
another indication of the way in which Putin defines “human rights,” not as
something that must be defended at all times and in all places but as an
elastic concept to be supported or not depending on political utility and
redefined at will to serve the Kremlin’s purposes.
And third, it shows a dangerous
tendency to dismiss any reports based on anonymous sources, even when anyone
who did come forward and identify himself or herself would be at risk of
reprisal legal or otherwise from the powers that be. That suggests that the Kremlin may be ready
to invoke this “standard” against media outlets in Moscow with regard to
Chechnya.
But such Kremlin attitudes have
consequences far beyond Chechnya, and this week the Presidential Administration
clearly served notice of that fact: it put in charge of supervising regional
affairs Yaroslav Zamychkin, an official who comes from Chechnya (kommersant.ru/gallery/3274609 and sobkorr.ru/news/58F5CFB868857.html).
No comments:
Post a Comment