Paul
Goble
Staunton, April 19 – After Dmitry
Medvedev can’t answer whether there will be work for villagers, one of their
number observes that “Russia is the only country dying out in peacetime, where
residents of rural areas and small towns are joining the ranks of the poor … and
where 70 percent of the male population won’t live to pension age.”
On the Manganese portal, Aleksandr
Korenyeva said she was extremely disappointed that the Russian prime minister
promised “to try to lift up almost every village” but couldn’t say where Russians
there would work (mngz.ru/russia-world-sensation/print:page,1,2866384-medvedev-zayavil-chto-v-derevnyah-ne-nuzhno-takogo-kolichestva-naseleniya.html).
Yesterday, Medvedev visited the
Tambov Bacon Factory and asked for questions. Korenyeva says she has no doubt
that all those inquiries were cleared in advance but even so, Medvedev was not
able to give a clear answer to the most important one about providing work for
villagers.
The prime minister continued to
display his ignorance of realities, she continued, when he declared that it is
necessary “above all” to retain young people in the villages by ensuring that
conditions in villages must be “more or less similar” to those in cities. But
that would be possible only if there was an economic foundation for the
villages. There isn’t, Korenyeva says.
Then Medvedev made the clearest
statements of his own failure to understand what is happening outside the
cities: he said that only “private capital provides work places and that this
doesn’t depend on the government,” as if government policies had nothing to do
with the number of work places.
The prime minister even suggested
that in his opinion, “the village is beginning to be reborn,” although he added
that “if the villages empty out, that means that the agrarians have begun to
work better.” And he concluded with
words that will be recalled by villagers whenever reference is made to his
Marie Antoinette-like statement that there is no money but hold on.
Medvedev observed that when he had
just jointed the government in 2006, “35 percent of the population lived in the
villages; now, 25 percent does … This doesn’t always mean that everything is
bad: In a number of cases it means that labor has become more highly qualified,
the productivity of labor is growing, and therefore we don’t need so many
people in the villages.”
“But at the same time,” the premier
said, “this is all the same a trend that generates concerns, and the state must
keep track of it.”
No comments:
Post a Comment