Paul
Goble
Staunton, April 3 – As Grigory
Yavelinsky and Boris Vishnevsky have pointed out, what many called Russia’s
presidential election was in fact a plebiscite of the kind Charles Louis
Napoleon pulled off in 1851. Only now, Russian commentator Yevgeny Ikhlov
argues, “are the real elections beginning.”
The events in Volokolamsk and
Kemerovo have made it impossible for Russia to remain under the sway of images
of new rockets and flights to Mars, Ikhlov says. “All immediately now say:
first, provide fire protection and decent trash processing and then make your
cosmic torpedoes and explore deep space” (kasparov.ru/material.php?id=5AC240709BBD2).
New
charges and arrests among the prominent show that “a new round of elite purges”
are beginning analogous to “the Leningrad affair of 70 years ago.” Ordinary
people are taking to the streets spontaneously, and any possibility that PR can
contain the situation no longer exists.
Now, both the regime and its opponents are locked in a struggle for real
results.
All
this provides evidence that the opposition is right when it speaks about “the
fatal nature of preserving the inert scenario of development.” What has
occurred in the last six months was only the prelude to a real struggle and in
its way “a real election” that will decide the future of Russia in ways the
voting on March 18 did not.
No comments:
Post a Comment