Paul
Goble
Staunton, April 5 – The most serious
problem the Russian state budget faces is not declining oil prices or
corruption or sanctions, Andrey Nalgin says. Rather is it the increasing number
of pensioners, a number that the Kremlin is doing everything it can to reduce
not only by raising retirement ages but also by other means as well.
This was confirmed four days ago, the
economic analyst says, when the Vedomosti
newspaper, citing a finance ministry document, reported that “the aging of
the population of Russia remains the chief risk for budgetary expenditures
despite the increase in the pension age” (vedomosti.ru/economics/articles/2019/04/01/797995-starenie-naselenie).
Over the next 16 years, Nalgin says,
the number of women under 55 and of men under 60 will decline by 2.7 million, with
most of this fall off happening in the next five years. Over the same period,
the number of Russians over those ages will increase by five million (a-nalgin.livejournal.com/1676886.html
reposted at newizv.ru/news/economy/04-04-2019/sbrosit-ballast-kak-gosudarstvo-izbavlyaetsya-ot-starikov).
Among the measures Russian officials
are considering to change these trends, he says, are some taken from the
practices of other countries and others dreamed up in Moscow. These strategies
include making early retirement more difficult, a gradual reduction in social
services for the elderly, and shifting health care to co-pay arrangements.
The last involves limiting the
access of the elderly to state-financed medical assistance. That idea came up
two years ago, Nalgin says; but the Kremlin vetoed it because it was concerned
about its ratings. Now, however, it isn’t – and so more moves in that direction
can be expected this year.
Given that most pensioners live from
pension payment to pension payment now, few of them will be able to pay for
such medical expenses. They will simply not be able to. As a result, they will suffer
and die earlier, and the Russian regime’s budget problem will be eased by a
reduction in the number of pensioners.
“It is very difficult to call this
initiative other than cannibalistic,” the analyst concludes.
No comments:
Post a Comment