Paul Goble
Staunton,
August 2 – Trump and Putin, Erdogan, have “one and the same friends and
enemies,” Igor Eidman says, not divided along the usual class lines of workers
and employers but between residents of major cities and rural areas, between
the young and the old, and “between people of the old industrial and the new
post-industrial economy.”
This
is especially obvious in the United States, the Russian commentator for Deutsche Welle says, “where many workers
and businessmen of traditional branches (from farmers to oil men) support
Trump, and new entrepreneurs and innovators are often the most convinced
anti-Trumpites” (afterempire.info/2018/08/02/no-oklahoma/).
In the United States, Eidman says,
there is a clear clash between “the new and old models of the economy” and the
corresponding views of those in each on society. “A notional Oklahoma finds itself
in a clinch with a notional Silicon Valley.”
The real meaning of the current
conservative wave is not about “anti-immigrant hysteria.” That is “just a populist
device,” the commentator says. What is really going on is “a revolt of the agrarian-industrial
backwaters against the worldwide Silicon Valley, against globalization and the new
creative economy.”
Any attempt to stop progress, of
course, is “doomed,” Eidman says. “The present-day Luddites headed by Trump do
not have a future.”
Like Trump, “Putin is attempting to
defend an old socio-economic system. But if in the US, this is traditional industrial
capitalism, in Russia, it is contemporary feudalism with bureaucrat-land holders,
oligarch-assignees of the ruler and a semi-enserfed majority of the population.”
And that points to a key difference
between Putin and his country and Trump and his. “Industrial workers or farmers
in the US are interested in the preservation of the old order. The Russian
backwoods aren’t. The present regime has condemned it to poverty and a wretched
existence.”
“Therefore,” Erdogan says, “Putin
unlike Trump … does not have the powerful supporter even in his notional ‘Oklahoma’
which is very dissatisfied with his social policies.”
In the event of a crisis, very few
of those Russians would come to Putin’s defense because “the Putin regime does
not have an active mass base and therefore will hardly survive any serious
shocks,” the Russian commentator says.
No comments:
Post a Comment