Paul
Goble
Staunton, September 7 – Moscow opposition
groups regularly give lip service to the idea of federalism, but when push comes
to shove, they take positions so similar to the powers that be that people in
the regions beyond the ring road find it difficult if not impossible to tell them
apart, the Region.Expert portal says.
The case of Sergey Mitrokhin, a
Yabloko candidate for the Moscow city council, provides clear evidence for
that, the portal continues. “Despite
sharp political conflict of recent months, it suddenly turns out that he works”
for all, both opposition and the Russian authorities (region.expert/mitrokhin/).
“The
authorities who have blocked a multitude of opposition figures from running
allowed him to be a candidate for the elections, and at the same time, Aleksey
Navalny recommended him on his life for ‘intelligent voting.’ A surprising
degree of agreement,” it would seem, Region.Expert continues.
But it is not surprising at all if
one looks at Mitrokhin’s platform. He
says Moscow has every right to send its trash to “underpopulated regions” of
the rest of the country, including of course Karelia, the republic from which Emiliya
Slabunova, the head of the Yabloko Party, comes.
Yabloko makes the usual obeisance to
“’the rebirth of federalism’” when it is making general declarations. But when
it comes to real cases, its leaders, including Mitrokhin, act as if Moscow is
entitled to send its trash to the regions without their consent even as it
takes resources from them, again without consent, to make itself in his words, “’the
richest city of Russia.’”
Mitrokhin doesn’t trouble to ask
himself why Moscow is rich and why the regions are depopulating, Region.Expert
continues. Instead, “he boldly shows his profoundly imperial way of thinking,”
concerned about taking care of the imperial center even at the cost of stealing
from the regions and giving them trash in return.
No wonder he is acceptable to the
powers that be in Moscow, the portal concludes; but it then asks rhetorically, “how
is such an opposition to be distinguished from the authorities?” From the point of view of the regions, these
two groups don’t appear as fundamentally different as they often are assumed to
be.
No comments:
Post a Comment