Paul
Goble
Staunton, December 2 – Two-thirds of
Russians like the bear as a symbol of their country even though it was
originally developed by the country’s opponents and used as a propaganda tool
against them, Dmitry Bavyrin says. “In
this,” he suggests, “is something from Dostoyevsky if not from Sacher-Masoch.”
Why have Russians adopted as their
symbol and even come to believe that it is part of their national tradition an
image that was in fact dreamed up by the country’s geopolitical opponents to
make fun of or to suggest that the Russians were a wild and barbarous people? the
Vzglyad commentator asks (vz.ru/society/2019/12/2/1011291.html).
“Initially,” he writes, “this
playing at an association did not have under it politics, only as aspect of
objective reality. The bear is the largest predator on the European continent
and Russia is the largest country beyond which there extended still more
enormous and unmastered spaces.” There is also the fact that “the Greek words
for ‘north’ and for ‘bear’ are different in only one letter.
And “finally,” Bavyrin says, “already at the time of the Muscovite
principality, Russia was the supplier of specific goods – bear skins and living
bears, including the white bear.” Europeans knew little of Russia except from
the reports of diplomats, and one, von Herberstein illustrated his reports with
a picture of bears.
“There
was no Russophobia or anything close to in in this book,” the Moscow
commentator continues. But the image of the bear became associated with the
image of Russia for people in Europe from then on. However, they did not equate
the land with a bear. Instead, “the bear was as it were a particular feature of
Russia but not its symbol.”
But in the
18th century, the British created a series of prints showing Russia
as a bear, part of the tradition in English of “animalistic maps” based on
caricatures. The French took this over
at the time of the Crimean War and gave the Russian bear a new dimension. If
for the English, the Russian bear represented aggressiveness, for the French,
it stood for “uncouthness.”
“Gotfried
Leibniz, the founder of Berlin Academy of Sciences, called the Russians ‘baptized
bears,” to stress what he saw as their wild nature. “Later this analogy was
used also by the Nazis when Goebbels’ propagandists showed Russia as a bear
with “a characteristic ‘Jewish’ nose.”
When
the bear as symbol of Russia came to America in the early 19th
century, the positive feelings Americans had toward Russia then meant that the
use of this symbol carried with it the ideas that Russia was strong “’in the
good sense.’” Later, during the Cold War, the Americans invested the symbol
with more negative meanings.
“It
isn’t surprising,” Bavyrin says, that the bear was for Americans a more
important symbol of Russia than Red Square, the Kalashnikov and the matryoshka
doll. “In Russia itself, it occupied only fourth place, behind the two-headed
eagle, the Kremlin, and the birch tree, according to a researcher from Ivanovo
State University.
That Russians have
now taken up this symbol and made it their own is “not a sign of weakness. On the
contrary, it is an indication of strength,” an intentional act of redefinition.
In Soviet times, the population didn’t know about American use of the bear as the
symbol of Russia; but the elite did – and it tried hard to replace it with gentle
Mishka at the Olympics.
But now, polls show, Russians want
to have the bear be their simple not as some friendly plaything but as a symbol
of strength and power.
No comments:
Post a Comment