Paul
Goble
Staunton, January 24 – This week, the Russian news agency Novosti featured
an article entitled “The CIA has Published Archive Documents about Bandera as ‘an
Agent of Hitler’” (ria.ru/20200124/1563807705.html),
a story that went viral especially after it was boosted by Russian foreign
ministry spokesperson Mariya Zakharova (ria.ru/20200124/1563811440.html).
Not
surprisingly, given the subject and given the Russian government’s desire to
blacken the reputation of Ukrainian nationalists of all stripes, the story has
gone viral in the Russian media from which it can be counted on to spread to
sympathetic media in Ukraine and in the West.
But
as Yury Bershidsky of The Insider portal points out, there are serious
problems with the story itself, problems which were ignored by those who reported
it in the first place and even more often by other outlets that have repeated the
story and left out key aspects of it (theins.ru/antifake/198015).
As the media analyst points out, the
story was not just released by the CIA but rather released more than a decade
ago as a declassified document from the early 1950s. It was not a CIA study but
rather a translation of an émigré publication and identified as ‘unevaluated.’”
And the original emigre article itself contains information which undercuts its
conclusions.
The article Moscow has published now
was declassified by the CIA in 2006 (cia.gov/library/readingroom/docs/BANDERA%2c%20STEFAN_0018.pdf)
and consists of a translation a 1951 article from the Menshevik émigré journal Sotsialistichesky
vestnik identified by that publication as the personal view of its author (archive.org/details/lucile-ait_mail_51_201509/page/n17/mode/2up).
But there is more that should be
noted in using this article, Bershidsky specifies. The 1951 story says that Bandera was run as
an agent by a man who was later identified as a Soviet agent. Using the standards
Moscow has applied in this case, one could thus conclude that Bandera was not an
agent Hitler but of Stalin.
No comments:
Post a Comment