Paul
Goble
Staunton, July 19 – The trade-off US
President Barack Obama made with his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin to get
a deal on Iran “is acquiring new and, in our time, somewhat unexpected aspects,”
Andrey Illarionov says, colors that unfortunately suggest “Russia, the US, Iran
and the EU are together, together without Ukraine,” even “together against
Ukraine.”
On Kasparov.ru today, the Russian commentator says
that Putin has now responded to Obama’s praise of Russia’s role in the Iranian
talks with a dramatic shift in his rhetoric about the US and about Moscow’s
ability to cooperate with Washington on a wide variety of issues (kasparov.ru/material.php?id=55AB3504C13B0).
Not long ago, Illarionov says, Putin
was routinely saying that Russia could not tolerate the US as the single
superpower. The US, in his version of reality, “considers itself to be the only
center of force in the world, it doesn’t need allies; it needs only vassals.
Russia in such a system of relations cannot exist” (kremlin.ru/events/president/news/49261).
And just two weeks ago, Putin told the Russian
Security Council that Moscow must prepare to survive under conditions of “the
unfriendly course by some of our geopolitical opponents,” the EU and the US (kremlin.ru/events/president/news/49862).
Immediately after the deal on Iran, however, Putin
changed his tone: On Tuesday of this week, he spoke about “the constructive
cooperation” of the US and Russia in the framework of the six and “stressed”
the role of “Russian-American dialogue in providing security and stability in
the world” (kremlin.ru/events/president/news/49999).
And then on Thursday, one day after Ukraine carried
out part of the Minsk-2 accords at Moscow’s and Washington’s assistance, Putin
and the entire rest of the Russian Security Council “stressed the leading role
and constructive position of the US.” Putin even talked then about how the
final Iranian accord became possible because “of the leading role” of the United
States (kremlin.ru/events/president/news/50011).
Some may see this as the opening of a new page in
Russian-American relations. That is certainly what Putin wants, and he
undoubtedly hopes that he has found a way out of the corner into which he had
driven himself by invading Ukraine. The
Russian president is certain to hope he will find a new understanding of his
position in Washington.
That may happen, but if it does, some countries are
going to suffer collateral damage and among them in the first instance will be
Ukraine, Illarionov suggests. He points to
a new Facebook post by Sergey Markov, a former KGB officer who is close to the
Putin regime, as indicative of the likelihood of that (facebook.com/sergey.markov.5/posts/688778531249815).
In that post, Markov says: “As was expected, Putin
and Obama positively spoke to each other. They greeted one another over the
Iranian accord … now a possibility for compromise has appeared. It is important
that the US end its policy of isolating and demonizing Putin,” he continued.
“I hope,” Markov writes, “that Obama will continue
the policy of revising his own mistakes and return Russian-American relations
from hybrid war to peace.” And he
stressed what he viewed as the importance of the fact that in their recent
exchanges, the two leaders did not talk about Ukraine.”
That will now be put in the past, Markov says. “Now
it is necessary to act together against ISIS. Russia, the US, Iran, and the EU
together.”
“As far as the main thing is concerned, at the
present moment, Markov alas is right,” Illarionov concludes extending his
earlier analysis about the deal between Obama and Putin on Iran (windowoneurasia2.blogspot.com/2015/07/obama-has-sold-out-ukraine-to-get-deal.html),
“Russia, the US, Iran and the EU together. Together without Ukraine. Together
against Ukraine.”
No comments:
Post a Comment