Paul
Goble
Staunton, April 3 – In the 1990s,
Chechnya sought independence from Moscow, and Vladimir Putin has made the
suppression of that regional insurgency a centerpiece of his claims for public
support. But now, in 2017, Nezavisimaya
gazeta suggests, that North Caucasus republic may be on its way to becoming
a greater threat than it was to Russia as a whole.
To put it more succinctly than the
Moscow paper does, Chechnya’s drive for independence in the 1990s and 2000s
threatened the territorial integrity of the country in one small part of it.
Chechnya’s independent actions now call into question the arrangements within
and among all of Russia’s component parts as well as its centralized political
system.
In a lead article today entitled
“Will Our Federation Withstand Chechen Customs?” the editors say that Grozny’s
decision to permit pupils to wear the hijab “poses serious questions about the
federal arrangement of Russia” because the Chechens have essentially gone their
own way without regard to Moscow (ng.ru/editorial/2017-04-03/2_6964_red.html).
The Kremlin has played down these
implications, the editors say, with spokesman Dmitry Peskov suggesting that
Putin has not taken a position on this conflict between the actions of a
republic government and the decisions of the all-Russian duma and federal
courts – despite the fact that Putin earlier had declared that the hijab was a
religious and not a national custom.
Grozny’s position is exactly the opposite,
the paper continues. “Formally, the
decision of the Chechen parliamentarians corresponds to the constitutional
principle of federalism. In this, the Chechen elite is right,” and in many
countries decisions on such matters are made below the federal level.
But if one goes “beyond this limit,”
Nezavisimaya gazeta says, “there is a
threat to the unity of the state.”
This is not the first time the
Chechen Republic “has demonstrated a special attitude toward the norms of
public morality.” In December 2016, for example, Grozny closed all alcohol
stores, and over the last three years, Ramzan Kadyrov has unilaterally banned
fortune tellers and the like.
“All this allows
one to speak about the special status of Chechnya, when the principle of
federalism is realized only toward selected subjects,” the editors continue. If
other federal subjects were to try to assert the same right, Moscow would
clearly have a different response – and that difference in itself represents a
danger to the country.
No one should imagine that this is just
about Muslim republics. “In Russia, there are three enormous Buddhist republics
and Buddhist districts in mixed oblasts, [and] there are registered
extra-territorial national cultural autonomies” for them elsewhere as well.
And then is a more profound
question: should the federal rights that have been given to Chechnya be
extended only to non-Russian republics or should they apply to predominantly ethnic
Russian oblasts and krays as well. To ask that question is to raise an issue
that challenges the existing system.
Many talk about how unique Chechnya
is, the editors conclude, but “reacting to the challenges of federalism by
necessity rather than by rules, the state guarantees its effective functioning
only if it has a strong leader. If Russia loses a Yezhov-type administration,
his system of personal administration will soon enter a fatal crisis.”
No comments:
Post a Comment