Paul
Goble
Staunton, April 1 – Last Sunday’s
marches against corruption highlight that “there really are certain aspects of
a revolutionary situation in Russia, Semyon Novoprudsky says. But “the chief
revolutionary isn’t Navalny but rather Putin who, beginning with the Crimean adventure
has consistently destroyed the foundations of his own regime.”
In a commentary for Kyiv’s Novoye
vremya, the Russian journalist says that before Crimea, the Putin regime
offered the country stability: “the people lived quietly and weren’t interested
in politics, and we stole as we could and shared a bit with them” (nv.ua/opinion/novoprudskiy/budet-li-russkij-majdan-898638.html).
But after the Crimean Anschluss and
the imposition by the West of sanctions, he continues, the Kremlin changed its
line and no longer talked about stability.
Instead, the only basis for the state and loyalty to it was “’war’ –
cold, hot, hybrid, or any combination. The state stopped promising to make
people’s lives better.”
Instead, “it said that it is
defending the people from imaginary enemies whom it names by itself. No one is to ask ‘a savior’ about the ruble
exchange rate or impoverishment,” Novoprudsky says.
As a result, he continues, Russia
over the last three years was “transformed from a corporatist state of ‘the
friends of Putin’ into a full-blown militarist dictatorship,” in which all
institutions were subordinate to a single individual and the survival of Russia
was directly linked to the survival of that individual.
Navalny’s marches “showed the vulnerability
of that construction.” People are no longer
afraid to protest, but on the other hand, there is as yet “no clear
all-national theme of protest” like the one in Ukraine when Yanukovich suddenly
refused to sign the association agreement with the European Union.
There is no point in appealing to
this regime, Novoprudsky says. “It is stupid to demand from Putin the
retirement of Medvedev given that the prime minister doesn’t decide anything in
the country and that he is far from the only corrupt figure.”
Moreover, “it is stupid to demand
from Putin a real struggle with corruption because corruption for a long time
already has been the format of relations of state and society at all levels …
in this sense, the entire country has been corrupted and not only the powers
that be,” the journalist continues. Putin
has been in office too long to correct this.
“Russia is at an economic dead end
which it is trying to compensate for by the sale to the world of threats of its
military potential, its interference in the affairs of other states, and its
capacity ‘to choose any president.’” Moreover, it has shown that “it isn’t
afraid of violating international rules of the game.”
But at the same time, “there is no
mass hunger or military losses like those which accompanied the beginning of the
February and then the October revolutions of 1917.” And so one can “confidently” assert that
while the Russian authorities now must focus on saving themselves, this “doesn’t
mean Navalny’s marches represent the start of a ‘Russian Maidan.’”
No comments:
Post a Comment