Paul Goble
Staunton,
October 25 – Most discussions of dedovshchina
– the mistreatment of more recent draftees by those further along in their
service – in the Soviet army have focused on conflicts between Slavic nations,
on the one hand, and Muslim peoples form Central Asia and the Caucasus, on the
other.
But a new article on the Russian 7
portal by Moscow writer Nikolay Syromyatnikov says that ethnic Belarusians were
more often the victim of dedovshchina crimes than Russians or even Ukrainians,
a report that undermines the notion that Russians don’t see Belarusians as a
distinct nation (russian7.ru/post/kakoe-otnoshenie-bylo-k-prizyvnikam-iz/).
And it also
suggests that service in the Soviet military may have been a nationalizing
experience for Belarusians just as it was for many other non-Russian groups,
something few observers appear to have considered but one that helps explain
Belarusian attitudes about the Russian army and any combination of the forces
of the two countries.
Belarusian resistance to service in the
Soviet military in the first years after World War II is well-documented
because it led to massive draft resistance and revolts by soldiers who had
nonetheless been taken into service, Syromyatnikov says. Later, Belarusians in the Soviet military
appeared to have adapted better.
But in fact, while Belarusians
tended not to form the informal communities other nationalities including Russians
and Ukrainians did, largely because they were relatively few in number, when
their numbers grew, they were just as likely to have such groups and to become
victims or victimizers as anyone else, including the notorious Daghestanis.
Two other things have obscured the
mistreatment of Belarusian soldiers, the commentator says. On the one hand,
Belarusians were far more ambitious to rise in the ranks than were Ukrainians
and so typically sought to conform and follow the orders of their commanders in
the hopes of preferment.
And on the other, while Slavs were
victims of dedovshchina in Soviet times, they were so far less often than
Central Asians and Caucasians and so the differences in the treatment of the three
nations attracted and continues to attract less attention than would otherwise be
the case, Syromyatnikov suggests.
No comments:
Post a Comment