Paul Goble
Staunton,
October 18 – The powers that be in Russia are afraid of any changes, technical
or social, that they have not explicitly sanctioned in advance, experts at the
Agora Analytic Center say in a new report, because any and all changes will
entail the loss of their power and wealth.
In
an 18-page report entitled The Neophobia
of the Russian Powers that Be, Pavel Chikov and Damir Gaynutdinov say that
these fears limit Russia’s progress in all areas except those the powers hope
will keep them in power: the monitoring of the population, propaganda and
censorship (docs.rferl.org/ru-RU/2018/10/17/e8b8bf33-3790-4bfe-a7cf-cae16cf95868.pdf).
This pattern, they say, explains why
Russia is lagging ever further behind in medicine and biotechnology but moving
ahead with programs to control the Internet and the media. In the latter,
Russia is at the cutting edge, something that is often ignored given its
backwardness in other areas, the two specialists on media say.
The Agora experts note, however,
that Moscow has not yet achieved what it hopes for as far as media control is
concerned and predict, as New Times stresses in its discussion of the new report,
that the Kremlin will soon sanction updated versions of jamming which the
Soviet authorities used to block Western radio stations (newtimes.ru/articles/detail/171422).
The policies the
Putin regime have adopted with regard to medical innovation and care reflect
not only its own views, Chikov and Gaynutdinov say, but also “the influence of the
Russian Orthodox Church.”
Since 2015, the Putin regime has cut
back its expenditures on medical care and research, less because of budgetary
stringencies, they imply, than because it does not see them as necessary to the
regime’s survival. Instead, they have focused on the installation of more devices
to monitor the population.
In Moscow alone, they have installed
more than 100,000 cameras on the streets, an expensive move that allows the
authorities to monitor protests. Moreover, Russia has made important advances
in facial recognition technology and the blocking of Internet sites, means to
control the population rather than to innovate as such.
Such an approach may bring the
powers that be short-term protection, Chikov and Gaynutdinov say; but this “fear
of the new” not only distorts government spending but interferes with Russia’s economic
development and thus its longer-term prospects, something some in the regime
have to recognize even thought they are carrying out these policies.
No comments:
Post a Comment