Paul Goble
Staunton,
October 22 – Polls show that there is a growing demand in Russia, especially
among the young, for using force to address current social and political
problems, a development that helps to explain why the younger generation has a
more positive view of Stalin who used force and a more negative one of the 1960s
generation who didn’t.
Moscow
commentator Sergey Chernyakhovsky reviews these poll results in an essay for Moskovsky komsomolets (km.ru/v-rossii/2018/10/21/vnutrennyaya-politika-v-rossii/831757-molodezh-i-repressii-ottorzhenie-temy). His
key conclusions are summarized by Oleg Kizim for the Publicist portal (publizist.ru/blogs/107559/27572/).
“There is a growing demand for the
forcible resolution of problems in the country, Chernyakhovsky says. “And this
is one of the explanations for the lack of acceptance by society and especially
by the young of the notion that Stalin-era repressions.” Indeed, there appears
to be a greater acceptance of the idea that any state which rejects the use of
force is doomed.
Russians and especially the young
want to see those they identify as responsible for their problems punished. And
the population feels that if the powers that be are unwilling to do so, then
the people should take such things into their own hands, the Moscow commentator
continues.
This is particularly true among
young people, he says. “If 30 years ago, the younger generation could protest
against ‘their elders’ as involved in ‘the justification of repression,’ then
now, the young see in their elders people ‘who rejected repression’” and as a
result lost their country.
Thirty years ago, people asked “’why
did you shoot the innocent?’” Now they are asking instead, “’why didn’t you
shoot the guilty?’” People want justice
and even revenge, Chernyakhovsky says. And they accept the argument of Vilfredo
Pareto that “the inability to apply force is evidence of the degradation of the
elite.”
“Imagine if young people were to be asked, ‘Do
you consider it permissible in the current situation to destroy 700,000 and
isolate from society another three million
supporters of Banderite fascism, Baltic neo-Nazism, American aggression against
Russia and its other enemies acting on Russian territory?’” Or asked whether
officials behind unjust laws and economists behind price rises should suffer for
what they have done?
How Russians and especially young
Russians would answer is easy to predict.
“The laws of political life are
simple and uniform,” Chernyakhovsky argues. “Either the elite finds in itself
the courage to use repression against minorities hostile to the majority or the
majroty begins to apply repression against elites.”
And the corollary of this, he says,
is that “a country which rejects repression as an instrument of struggle with
its enemies, opponents and competitors condemns itself to being the prey and
object of similar repressions by their enemies, opponents and competitors.”
No comments:
Post a Comment