Paul Goble
Staunton,
October 23 – Ten years after becoming Moscow patriarch, Kirill by actions that
threaten to isolate the Russian church from all others risks not only losing
his influence at home and abroad but even his job, according to Andreas D.
Loudaros, the editor of the Greek Orthodoxia
portal.
According
to the journalist who specializes on developments in the Orthodox world, Kirill
today is “only one step from the greatest possible loss, that is, being
stripped of his position as patriarch,” the result both of his response to
Constantinople’s moves on Ukraine and earlier mistakes as well (orthodoxia.info/news/москва-хочет-изменения-de-facto-против-себя/).
Kirill, who has “a
deep knowledge of all church traditions as well as present-day realities,” might
have been expected to avoid such a fate; but “instead of this, we over the last
several years have observed how he has made one mistake after another and hasn’t
learned from bitter experience or at least does not understand” where things
are headed, Loudaros argues.
Kirill’s problem and that of the
church he heads is that neither understands that other Orthodox churches do not
see the world the way they do, something that is clear if one looks at history
but that for some reason the Moscow Patriarch doesn’t want to draw the obvious
lessons, the journalist says.
Moscow has extended the tomos of
autocephaly itself to other churches in Eastern Europe and the US only to
discover that the chief Orthodox churches have not followed its lead – and have
only moved when the Universal Patriarch has been willing to confirm such
Russian grants with his own recognition of the self-standing nature of this or
that church.
That history should have taught
Moscow a lesson, that the grant of autocephaly is not by itself the key to universal
recognition and that trying to insist that it is isolates Moscow and strengthens
Constantinople rather than the other way around. Kirill as a diplomat of
longstanding should have understood that.
“Over the course of many decades,”
Loudaros continues, Moscow has wanted the Orthodox world to be what it assumes
it to be rather than what it is. As a result, it has “definite problems in
finding solid arguments” for its positions and is rendering itself ridiculous
in the eyes of its own flock and those of others.
For example, Kirill refused to go the
synod organized by Constantinople because his spokesman said he could not
possibly attend a meeting in a church that did not have a cross on its
cupola. And now Moscow says that
Constantinople “does not have the right to decide for other Orthodox churches
because it is located in a Muslim country.”
The absurdity of that position is
obvious if one considers that there are other Orthodox churches including Alexandria,
Antioch, and Jerusalem which are located not in Christian countries but in
others. How can Moscow expect to lead the Orthodox world if it is so ignorant
or uncaring about reality?
If you are obsessed about your own
self-importance, the commentator continues, “then you must be concerned that
your arguments have a corresponding weight.” At least, they have to have some
relationship to logic and the facts.
It is already quite clear that Ukrainian
autocephaly “not only is not weakening the position and authority of the
Universal Patriarch but on the contrary is strengthening its ecumenical
character,” while Moscow and Kirill are suffering real losses that may only
grow if it continues its current course.
“Of course,” Loudaros says, “it is
difficult to predict the development of events to the end.” But one thing is
clear: Only one player can now block autocephaly for Ukraine, and that is the
Ukrainian church itself if it does not act with the seriousness that the
current situation requires. Moscow can’t do so on its own and should recognize
that reality.
No comments:
Post a Comment