Paul Goble
Staunton,
October 25 – As announced earlier, the Constitutional Court of Ingushetia held
a hearing today on the legality of the way in which the agreement between
Yunus-Bek Yevkurov and Chechnya’s Ramzan Kadyrov about the border agreement was
reached and then subject to ratification. The court said it would need several
more hearings before rendering a verdict (kavkaz-uzel.eu/articles/327132/ and newsru.com/russia/25oct2018/ingushetia.html).
The
suit challenging the agreement was brought by 12 of the 31 members of the republic
parliament, more than the one-third needed to do so; and both sides appear to
be confident that the court will rule in their favor. On the one hand, the
court itself is part of Yevkurov’s administration and is likely to approve what
he has done.
But
on the other, the chief judge has criticized Yevkurov’s handling of the agreement
and especially the republic head’s decision to have the Popular Assembly ratify
it rather than treat it as an executive agreement or subject it to a referendum
as the republic constitution explicitly requires of any border adjustments.
That
the court did not quickly hand down a decision means either that the judges have
not been able to reach one quickly – a possibility that gives Yevkurov’s
opponents hope – or that the judges are doing what the republic head wants and
drawing out the process in the expectation that the protesters will get tired
or will come around to his position.
Other
Ingush-related developments over the last 24 hours included:
·
Yevkurov and representatives of his
administration continued to hold meetings across Ingushetia to try to sell the
border accord. In some places, the force structures had to intervene to keep
opponents from speaking, an indication that so far the republic head has not
had much success in that regard (interfax-russia.ru/South/news.asp?sec=1671&id=977688 and bison-info.pro/protesty-v-ingushetii-2018-shodki/).
·
Chechnya’s
Kadyrov meaning demanded that an Ingush elder, Akhmed Barakhoyev, appear before
a shariat court for his criticism of the border accord and Grozny’s role in it
(grani-ru-org.appspot.com/Politics/Russia/Regions/m.273480.html).
·
Beslan
Uspanov, the editor of the Kavkazskaya politika portal, says that Yevkurov
remains in a state of shock that the Ingush people should have risen in protest
against his decision to sign a border agreement with Kadyrov. But he shouldn’t have been, the specialist on
the North Caucasus says, because in Ingushetia everything is about land and who
controls it (realnoevremya.ru/articles/117887-intervyu-belana-uspanova-o-volneniyah-v-ingushetii).
Looking forward, Ingush people expect that there will be
another massive gathering in the main square of Magas tomorrow for Friday
prayers, the result of growing cooperation between the Sufis and Salafis who in
the past have often refused to cooperate with one another (islamio.ru/news/policy/predstaviteli_razlichnykh_musulmanskikh_obshchin_zabyli_o_raznoglasiyakh_radi_obshchego_namaza_v_mag/).
Russian
analyst Daniil Kotsyubinsky argues that the Ingush will be able to “outplay”
the Kremlin and secure the cancellation of the border accord but only under one
condition: They must maintain tight discipline and not take any steps which
would give the Russian Guards or other siloviki an excuse to crush the protest
(gorod-812.ru/sumeyut-li-ingushi-pereigrat-kreml).
Unfortunately, he continues, that is going
to be hard over the next week: the Ingush congress scheduled to open on October
30 is going to take place on the latest anniversary of the 1992 tragedy between
the Ingush and the Ossetians and emotions will be running high. Indeed, he
suggests, the timing of the meeting may not be a coincidence at all.
And possibly adding fuel to the fire are
plans to hold an online discussion October 29 about the ways in which the
mental maps of the peoples of the North Caucasus and not just the Ingush seldom
correspond with the officially approved cartography, a discussion that could
lead even more people in the region to think about protesting (kavkaz-uzel.eu/blogs/1927/posts/35045).
No comments:
Post a Comment