Paul
Goble
Staunton, April 11 – In the wake of
protests in Ingushetia and Arkhangelsk where local police and even Russian Guards
units failed to act as quickly or even at all in the ways Moscow hoped, the
central Russian government has decided to set up a system under which units of the
regular army could be deployed to suppress popular risings, the Region.Expert portal says.
In any state, the military is the
last line of defense; and if a government signals that it is preparing that
defensive line, it is an indication that it no longer has confidence that its other
outer defenses will hold, a signal that the situation of the powers that be is
more dire than they acknowledge openly – and one that makes the use of the army
in such situations problematic.
Russian news agencies (rbc.ru/politics/09/04/2019/5caca4919a79475d5519d425
and m.ura.news/news/1052380223) are
reporting that Defense Minister Sergey Shoygu has announced that his agency
will open in all the regions of the Russian Federation “centers for the coordination
of the work of the force structures in crisis situations.”
The first of these “centers” will be
established in Tula, an oblast selected the Tallinn-based portal suggests
because the governor, Andrey Dyumin, is Putin’s former bodyguard and thus
perhaps especially impressed by the idea that the military could play a useful
role in defending not only the Russian state system but him personally (region.expert/army/).
If Shoygu’s plan goes into effect
there are elsewhere – and the regionalist portal notes that the Kremlin website
has not yet posted an order to that effect – Moscow will have put in place a
new system to allow it to introduce military force in places where there are
massive public protests or disorders and where it may no longer have confidence
in local police.
But as Region.Expert points out, this “hope that the army will suppress
massive public actions is even more illusory than that the MVD and Russian
Guard will.” Those institutions consist
of people selected and trained at crowd control and whose raison d’etre is to be used to defend the state against the people.
Armies, especially draft-based militaries
like the one in the Russian Federation, in contrast, consist of ordinary people
who are trained and prepared to be used against foreign enemies but are not in
many cases equally well prepared to be used against their own people,
especially because the draftees spring from them.
That suggests the Russian military
will either have to change its training program – focusing ever more on
controlling the domestic population than on fighting abroad or against some
notional invasion – or face the risk other states have in using a tool that may
prove counterproductive.
Indeed, Region.Expert concludes, “an attempt o fusing the army against the people
can lead to results exactly the reverse of what the powers that be want” and
even lead to events like those in Romania of 30 years ago when such an attempt did
not lead to the defense of the ruler and
his state but to his overthrow and that of his hated system.
No comments:
Post a Comment