Paul
Goble
Staunton, August 25 – The more the
Moscow Patriarchate of the Russian Orthodox Church supports Russian aggression
in Ukraine, “the fewer chances this church will have for a future not only in
Ukraine but also in Russia and in the entire world,” according to Yury
Chernomorets.
The Kyiv commentator notes that
Patriarch Kirill has appealed to the UN, the OSCE and the Universal Patriarch
concerning “attempts by Uniates and splitters to inflict harm on canonical
Orthodoxy in Ukraine by using the difficult situation arising as a result of
military actions in the southeast of the country” (day.kiev.ua/ru/blog/obshchestvo/zhelanie-religioznoy-voyny).
Kirill says he
is worried about Orthodox priests, Chernomorets says, but the Moscow patriarch
says nothing about the killing of four Protestant ministers in Slavyansk, an
action that appears to be the result of the ROC MP’s efforts to promote
conflicts among believers in order to aid Moscow’s aggression.
To the extent
that is the case – and there is evidence that it is from the conversations
intercepted between the church, the FSB and the pro-Moscow fighters in Donetsk
and Luhansk -- the Kyiv commentator says, this would be “the blackest day in
the history of Russian Orthodoxy.”
Moreover, Chernomorets
continues, such a view has been pushed by those close to the Moscow Patriarchate
“who already do not believe in the Gospels of Christ but believe in the Russian
empire as an Absolute Good and consider the entire rest of the world as
absolute evil” and even by Father Vsevolod Chaplin, one of Kirill’s “closest
comrades in arms.”
Chaplin, who heads
the Synod’s department for ties with society, has argued that “Orthodox
civilization” has “values above those of all-human and all-Christian ones” and
that insists that “the individual does not have any importance and [that] the
highest honor for him is to die for Orthodox civilization.”
The promoters
of this idea, of course, haven’t been rushing to the Donbas, Chernomorets points
out. Instead, those who are coming include those who have been “deceived” into
thinking that such views have anything to do with Christianity and that “all
are equal but some are ‘more equal’ than others” and thus deserve what they
get.
“Thanks be to
God,” the commentator continues, “the ‘Gospel According to Chaplin’ does not
inspire the Orthodox people of Ukraine and Russia.” Moreover, Orthodox believers in the main do not believe the
false version of events in Ukraine that the Moscow Patriarchate along with the
Russian government has been putting out.
If it were
otherwise, Chernomorets says, then “a religious conflict of the Yugoslav type
would already have broken out in Ukraine.” That would mean that “people who
least often go to church but have a cultural attachment” to religion” would be fighting
with each other for anything but real religious reasons.
“But the
ideologues of the Russian Orthodox Church are not taking into account several
Ukrainian realities,” he continues.
Compared to two decades ago, relations between believers and clergy of
various professions have become “a hundred times” more tolerant. And
brainwashing doesn’t work if people have experience with those of other faiths.
Moreover,
Moscow’s effort to undermine this tolerance by equating the Ukrainian Orthodox
Church and the Russian Orthodox Church has not worked either. On the one hand,
the Ukrainian Orthodox Church occupies “a realistic and pro-Ukrainian” position
and demands an end to the Russian occupation of Crimea.
And on the
other, Ukrainians “understand that even if they leave the Ukrainian Orthodox
Church [of the Moscow Patriarchate] and go over to the Ukrainian Orthodox
Church of the Kyiv Patriarchate, they must do so in a quiet and tolerant
fashion.” In such a situation, the
religious conflict the Kremlin and Kirill want isn’t going to happen.
But the most serious
consequences of the Moscow Patriarchate’s actions are going to be on the authority
of the Russian Orthodox Church not only in Ukraine but in Russia itself and
before the Orthodox and Christian worlds.
That is something Kirill ought to be thinking about rather than
short-term political gains with the Kremlin.
No comments:
Post a Comment