Paul
Goble
Staunton, August 7 –
“Paradoxically,” Vatslav Lisovsky says, ethnic Russians who have come to
Ukraine are often viewed much more favorably by Ukrainians than the residents
of the Russian capital are seen by the rest of the population of the Russian
Federation, a reflection of both history and current behavior.
In a blog post, Lisovsky points out
that until the time of Peter I, there was no such place as “Russia.” Instead,
the state was called the Great Principality of Moscow or the Kingdom of Moscow.
Indeed, as late as 1703, Peter himself referred to his status in a treaty with
Poland as “the Moscow monarch” (nr2.com.ua/blogs/waclaw_lisowski/«moskvich»-–-brannoe-slovo-dazhe-v-rossii-77379.html).
Only in 1721 did Peter having broken
through his “window on Europe” by building a new capital at St. Petersburg did
people begin to call Muscovy Russia and those who lived in its “Velkorossy” and
later simply “Russkiye.” That country’s
nearest neighbors, Ukrainians, Belarusians and Poles, “as before called the
Russians ‘Moskaly’ or ‘Muscovites,’” albeit with no negative connotation.
The word “Muscovite” [“Moskvich”]
appeared only somewhat later, Lisovsky writes, and referred not to the
residents of all Muscovy but “only those of the city of Moscow.” One of the
reasons for the change to Russia, he argues, is that Peter I did not like
Moscow either as a city or as a capital. (He even at one point thought of
moving the capital to Kyiv, Lisovsky says.)
Over time, Moscow became associated
strictly with the regime and Muscovites with the regime even if many of them
were oppressed by it as well, the blogger writes. People in the provinces came to view
Muscovites as a group in a very negative way, and “therefore when travelling
into the Russian backwaters … it is better for a Muscovite not to advertise who
he is.”
No comments:
Post a Comment