Paul
Goble
Staunton, August 30 – Vladimir Putin’s
decision to move toward a full-scale invasion of Ukraine shows that he “has no
other levers and resources” to achieve his will than to send in his soldiers,
but it also reflects the fact that what the Kremlin leader needs is “not victory
but war itself,” according to Kyiv political analyst Pavel Kruglyakovsky.
That allows him to keep the
situation unstable and others off balance and to give him the kind of freedom
of action that he desires, although he has passed the point not only where he
can maintain that situation but also where he must face the fact that this is “the
beginning of the end” of his regime (nr2.com.ua/News/politics_and_society/Putin-topit-pechi-kremlevskoy-propagandy-telami-pskovskih-desantnikov-ekspert-78890.html).
“By entering into a direct military
conflict with Ukraine,” the analyst says, “Putin is committing a fatal mistake”
because he will not be able to escape from the current situation “without
losing face,” something that he will do everything he can to avoid but that the
strength of Ukrainian forces will make impossible.
“The Russian army is far from as
powerful as the majority of people in Russia itself think,” Kruglyakovsky
argues. “Russia today is a colossus with feet of clay … the level of corruption
in Kremlin offices is an order higher than in Ukrainian ones … And when
generals steal, the men in the ranks suffer.”
“Today everything shows that the
Russian army is not so terrible and undefeatable as [Kremlin propagandist]
Dmitry Kiselyev suggests in his programs.
This fact is beginning to be recognized in Kyiv; soon they will
understand it in Moscow as well. The zinc caskets are already beginning to
arrive in the depths of Russia.”
Kryuglyakovsky
is certain, Novy region says, that Putin cannot win a military victory in
Ukraine because “a fatherland war [which is what Ukraine is fighting] is by its
internal energy always stronger than the need ‘to fulfill one’s international
duty’” especially in the case of a 40-million-strong nation that is prepared to
sacrifice itself for its freedom.
“How many
military capable units can Putin send against the army of Ukrainians?” the
analyst asks. “Even today [the Kremlin leader] is having to deceive his troops
by saying that he sending them on ‘manuevers.’” And that raises an even more
fundamental question: “does the Russian president need a victory in the
classical sense?”
“What would he
do with the Donbas where all the infrastructure has already been destroyed by
the hands of [his own] terrorists? Putin does not need ‘Novorossiya.’ Rather he
needs” something else: “unstable Luhansk and Donets oblasts” within the borders
of Ukraine not of Russia.
In short, “Putin
needs not victory but war itself,” Kryuglyakovsky concludes, and one that he will
pursue by constantly changing the slogans and stated goals in the hopes that he
can intimidate some and keep others off-balance as he searches for a way out
for himself from the disaster he has caused.
No comments:
Post a Comment