Paul
Goble
Staunton, August 24 – Vladimir Putin’s
Crimean Anschluss which was intended among other things to highlight or promote
divisions among Ukrainians about the status of their country has had exactly
the opposite effect: It has boosted the share of supporters of independent
statehood from 83 percent to 90 percent, the highest ever.
In reporting the poll results,
Valery Khmelko, president of the Kyiv International Institute of Sociology,
said that external threats have caused those who did not support the
independence of the country to do so because of threats and to recognize the
value of Ukraine for themselves (zn.ua/UKRAINE/podderzhka-nezavisimosti-ukrainy-vyrosla-do-rekordnyh-90-151320_.html).
But what the figures also show is
that -- entirely unintentionally -- Putin has done more than anyone else to
promote Ukrainian nation building just as Soviet dictator Joseph Stalin did
more than anyone else to promote Ukrainian state building by adding territories
to it in both the east and west.
After Ukraine gained independence in
1991, the share of those supporting its new status fell from 76 percent to 56
percent as a result of a deteriorating in the standard of living and
hyper-inflation. But even though the economic situation continued to
deteriorate in the mid-1990s, those who wanted to rejoin Russia fell
significantly after the 1994 elections.
Following Moscow’s intervention in
Chechnya in 1994-1996, the share of Ukrainians supporting Ukrainian statehood
rose again, to 71 percent; but during the economic crisis of 1997-1998, it fell
to 60 percent. But in 1999-2000, during Putin’s invasion of Chechnya, Ukrainian
support for independence returned to 72 percent.
In 2003, Khmelko continued, during the
Tuzla island crisis, backing among Ukrainians for state independence rose to 77
percent, although it fell back to 72 percent after the conflict was
resolved. Then in August 2008, when
Putin invaded Georgia, Ukrainian support for independence rose from 72 percent
to 83 percent, receding to 72 percent after the crisis.
“Year
after year,” the Kyiv sociologist says, “support for the sovereignty of Ukraine
by Ukrainians has grown [but] the process had stabilized. Now, however, the
outburst of civic self-consciousness has occurred in connect with direct
attacks by Russia on the territorial integrity and sovereignty of the country.”
No comments:
Post a Comment