Paul
Goble
Staunton, June 8 – “Russia is a
business project not a state,” Grigory Yavlinsky says. “The system is structured
as a corporation. And the basic goal of any business is the maximization of
profit and to avoid landing in jail in the process.” Consequently, the only way
to change the corporation is to seize its leadership.
Unfortunately, the Yabloko Party
leader told an audience in Moscow this week that at present “there are few chances”
of doing so as there are too few people informed by passion and prepared to
take the risks involved. But understanding the nature of the situation prevents
those who are from misdirecting their efforts (ttolk.ru/articles/yavlinskiy_rossiya__eto_biznes-proekt_a_ne_gosudarstvo_i_ego_ne_pobedit).
According to Yavlinsky, it is
important to recognize that just as no subordinate employee can redirect a
business, so too no subordinate political official in Russia can redirect the business
that is Putin’s Russia. And consequently, opposition figures should focus on change
at the top rather than trying to achieve “victories” at lower levels.
On the one hand, this is a recognition
of just how powerful Putin’s power vertical remains and how few options
political figures have at the regional or municipal level not to speak of the
federal one. But on the other, it is a justification for avoiding the kind of
political effort that could lead to the growth of opposition sentiments from
below.
Indeed, as Tolkovatel’s Pavel Pryanikov
points out in his report about Yavlinsky’s presentation, if the Yabloko leader now
wants to abstain from any political activity except at the presidential level,
one is entirely justified in asking why his political party even bothers to
continue to exist.
At the same time, he continues, Yavlinsky
is not without courage and deserves to be admired for that compared to other
Russian politicians and liberals. The Yabloko leader called for a new
referendum on Crimea, one that would allow free campaigning for the possibility
that the peninsula could remain Russian, be returned to Ukraine or become
independent.
And he called for an end to Moscow’s
direct participation in and support for secessionist forces of the Donbass, for
that region’s return to Ukrainian control, another position many Russian
liberals hold but are, according to the Tolkovatel editor and blogger, afraid
to express in public given the risk of sanction by the Kremlin.
No comments:
Post a Comment