Paul
Goble
Staunton, January 8 – Even in
Stalin’s times, the police and the judicial system had mixed feelings about
informers, Sergey Shelin says. On the one hand, they were glad to make use of
them to spread fear throughout society; but on the other, they often ignored
such reports because those in power overruled them.
Vladimir Putin’s regime has
encouraged people to turn in others in violation of this or that repressive
law, the Rosbalt commentator says; but even more than its Soviet predecessor,
its minions are of two minds as to how much credence to give to such reports
and as to whether they should be acted upon (rosbalt.ru/blogs/2020/01/08/1820321.html).
Under Stalin, he says, officials
often decided to ignore denunciations because they had other goals in mind.
Now, under Putin, the regime has even taken to giving officials guidance on
what kinds of denunciations they should pay attention to. (On that, see rg.ru/2019/10/10/mvd-raziasnilo-kogda-nuzhno-zavodit-delo-ob-oskorblenii-vlasti.html.)
“The past year has shown that this
approach works not as well as it did earlier,” that denunciations may be useful
to the authorities but they may get in the way by being contradictory or
leading officials to take actions that they would have been better advised to
avoid, as in the case of the Novoye velichiye prosecutions.
In other cases, denunciations worked
as intended, when they matched what the powers that be wanted to do in any
case. But that suggests that the relative
importance of snitching by the population at large is declining as compared to
reports by specialized and expert audiences who know better what is wanted.
If people see this trend, they may
be less inclined to serve as informers – and in that case, the authorities will
lose the collateral benefit such actions have, the spread of fear throughout
the population that everyone is being watched and can be reported on at any
time with potentially serious consequences.
No comments:
Post a Comment