Paul
Goble
Staunton, December 31 – In order to
conduct a serious disinformation campaign, the powers that be in Moscow
certainly need to create an Orwellian Ministry of Truth to oversee the release
of any information, Aleksandr Golts says. But the regime can’t have one because
its head would be more important than even Vladimir Putin.
That is because, the independent
Russian security commentator says, “practically everything that the domestic
bosses report does not correspond to reality” and therefore everyone, including
the Kremlin leader, would have to clear his remarks with the minister of truth
in advance (ej.ru/?a=note&id=34548).
Golts’ observation about Russia’s
need for a ministry of truth and the impossibility of establishing one comes at
the end of an article concerning the Russian defense ministry’s end-of-the-year
report of its successes in 2019 and its warning that it will respond to dishonest
slander with “correct slander” of its own.
The kind of “information diversion”
the defense ministry is warning about, Golts says, is now coming from within
that “most patriotic” of bureaucracies in that a deputy minister is
contradicting the defense minister by pointing out that only two regiments and
not three had been rearmed and that the program was fulfilled only 70 percent
and not 100 percent as Shoygu said.
This suggests that the ministry while
making progress in coming up with an agreed-upon version of reality still has
work to do. Things have improved in that it has at least dawned on top
officials that if they are going to talk about achievements, they at least
familiarize themselves with what they had promised was going to be the case.
For several years, the security
commentator says, they haven’t bothered to do so and the results have been
truly appalling with promises and accomplishments having little relationship to
each other. Now, these officials are becoming more careful but the gap between
the deputy minister and the minister shows there is more work to be done.
“In fact,” Golts says, “this entire
history yet again shows that all the data which the officials of the military ministry
provides do not have any relationship at all to reality.” They are all about making someone sound good
and nothing more. He adds that he “suspects”
that the defense ministry decided to conduct “information war” and thus felt this
was all right.
But “the ministry of defense is a
very large agency,” he continues. “And each commander seeks to give an
interview” and make himself look good. As a result, “the data which they release
do not in any way agree with each other.” Consequently, the defense ministry
very much needs a ministry of truth to ensure that lies are agreed upon in
advance.
Unfortunately, Golts concludes,
under Russian conditions, there is little possibility that such a much-needed
institution will be created. That means
that all reports need to be crosschecked on the assumption that not one of them
is accurate or reliable but only an indication of what someone in Moscow would
like others to believe.
No comments:
Post a Comment